Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03
Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Thu, 12 October 2023 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CAEC14CE38 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.831
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.831 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4os9gJ0qqmv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out162-62-58-211.mail.qq.com (out162-62-58-211.mail.qq.com [162.62.58.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38F69C14CE2C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1697070052; bh=JJjd3BadTEo32Ev0h0PLig+UloZzm267S9+wsPz2/X0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=lp1QlE0qe67/H0zIksUIuIjacqyy1mNuYUazuwElcAXMv1ODaHOGtJGmNJyc0aN6j oq91g01b1X15O7S4w4yZdQg9EEarrTs5aFwapQGFzzpP3onGtNw0IxRykBP8lIrtN1 4oMmdOkwCErqrqCLbH18Ob2hbhM0c4JZRNlCxy2w=
Received: from DESKTOP-48H476U ([219.142.69.75]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc5-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 533BB2E4; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:20:51 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1697070051tn1avfvfs
Message-ID: <tencent_ED951D859EF92AD7F180181CDD66DBB18208@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MB5+LsFw85NooJEtz6l+jnFuvD9JHq06zDlVY95nXxc6k8OjNy/7hMv9NPJC+2 h5JVDYPmXKP0D7OHc1Xu1oMI1IJx5B5+BjpV+IDMr5GlILW0r60zBolmiV8+WkhEt8LY4P236YIk GCr3aCrk6ZgxxM8vVUQ2ljIwUWFnFhjmZwQbxuNquwFTNczSlaRRGO3R3EG5PgCKdJz+0h1YjLTs JazhH44Hzu/+IM1RsaNrqpxQfDQaDqBW5mKfvmUefEH132ZDctYLRxRr/p+KSXjSqz3wgUs3FqUQ +04UsYxzBCXIVXY8xhtMoqVb5YD4SpYVjAGhVwnFnLFAhGH2qdFCGMmMCC/TvPkTigznw6MoHxtn R3OgtW8k1V8pRHr0TV9+mKF8FdA8dlHjZwayPJQeyEJYtJBSSJ/3TiNSncZYXyJzEAPn1Ch6CFEa m+fCTdiQORUPkSvpfG2yORnOhBejD28ZSILukGQfItOMTJ9aDs348Bn4tX4Wouu+z7xDctbGhFnh euy4j/gEirWLuMj8h3Zb1lfxHHQND4qnq0auQm8a2UZKXwxHXfI4to/OIA43jDNVSGsM2K7VsqnE xjRaD+J2hEUlWl6qGgN4im0nZ17mMo78CUcFNtUnWqPs968xlWH2wJl/iKjcWNs24dtVrxg+N7rh H4DkM6NV2OpoGvURpAj115Xn17P9F435nwnf4GcypVs8LPjxbG1+O7i+gPeBn47o8RB0W/Hq+DSY qscPEUXya/rK8MSUKqu0SH1e5xgMqIOTZpxwNCNQ6ROejrj7Ee2UlXucHmTZf+5iNvfYo7VGtlsX iruDifOkkD9qsDq86ptxUUlYFEQ3pkNftO43UpzH5yIsQQuVKkGHc0x/l34tUHz6Dk1lrecwDkS6 Oz0f/FbLViAwCt0Ed1QRdq0HsZUGI0Ok8imwn49NUgh0qvuYsqMYHtCsvwQiDE1ekT8vrIqfHMtc kiQWVAdT0kJnX4tyRgs2kIRmz6LOaYQgHgD646+xY=
X-QQ-XMRINFO: OD9hHCdaPRBwq3WW+NvGbIU=
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 08:20:52 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: list <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <169660647031.23597.13067349132781805398@ietfa.amsl.com>, <CAFU7BATORG5sruy19XMAXsfvqumOB7wL=G1EbNo-zUrtzoddNg@mail.gmail.com>, <tencent_BE90399FE81A0DD08DE3D64C3EB6AC72B705@qq.com>, <CAFU7BATr7oQ7S02DmKH62aGMkEDPHLdV-4f+7aU81kwzZf9VXA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 97487532-315B-449F-A0AE-62EAF21A04EE
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.24.96[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <202310120820516245101@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart028554157400_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lx-4bXo_I6XHBXA3_cgROoNZdsw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:21:03 -0000
Hi Jen, This diagram contains almost all the elements related to this solution: components, DHCP protocols, IPv6 addresses, etc., as well as legacy terminals and virtual systems. However, I believe that as an overall architecture diagram to assist readers in quickly understanding this solution, it may be too detailed and not easy to place and manipulate in the document. Therefore, I suggest that IPv6 address information may not be included in the diagram, and virtual system may not be included either, since it is just a usecase; In addition, the two occurrences of DHCP request/DHCP reply can be reduced to one, does this appear more concise? My opinion is for your reference only, and it is ultimately up to you to decide. :-) Best regards Chongfeng xiechf@chinatelecom.cn From: 【外部账号】Jen Linkova Date: 2023-10-11 17:29 To: Chongfeng Xie CC: list Subject: Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03 Hi Chongfeng, > I support the progress of this draft and hope that it will eventually pass the last call. Nevertheless,I have the following suggestions: > 1) This draft is about using DHCPv6 PD to Allocate Unique IPv6 Prefix to Client, the approache is described mainly in text. In order to help readers, especially those outside the v6ops community, understand it more quickly, it is recommended to add an diagram to show the overall architecture and the inter-relationships between the entities in it. I've crafted a diagram: https://t.ly/8c28V What do you think? It will be added to -04. > From: 【外部账号】Jen Linkova > Date: 2023-10-06 23:48 > To: V6 Ops List > CC: Vasilenko Eduard > Subject: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03 > Dear v6ops WG, > > We have just submitted the -03 version for > ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device - thank you very much to everyone who > provided feedback! > Please review and let us know if the draft is ready to progress. > > The main changes: > - Introduction is rewritten (much shorter and, hopefully, more clear) > - some text about multiple addresses use cases moved to Appendix. > - The Applicability and Limitation section is moved up, so it's in the > beginning - hopefully it would help the readers to understand what > scenarios are in scope and what are not. > - Client Mobility section added to discuss what happens when a client > moves between network attachment points. > - the draft is now explicit that it focuses on "a pool per link" > scenario, which also drastically simplifies the routing and relay > requirements (the routing section is updated as well). > - the draft now suggests Active Leasequery as one of the mechanisms to > keep the relay state in sync with the server. > - The Prefix Consideration section has been updated and states that > the endpoints are not required to use SLAAC - it's just the network > allows them to do that, if they need to. > - various changes to address other comments received during the WGLC so far. > > I'd like to ask everyone who has expressed concerns during this WGLC > (you are in Cc: - hopefully I didn't miss anyone) to review the new > version and let the author know if you still have concerns. > > Thank you! > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:35 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.txt is now available. It > > is a work item of the IPv6 Operations (V6OPS) WG of the IETF. > > > > Title: Using DHCPv6-PD to Allocate Unique IPv6 Prefix per Client in Large Broadcast Networks > > Authors: Lorenzo Colitti > > Jen Linkova > > Xiao Ma > > Name: draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.txt > > Pages: 18 > > Dates: 2023-10-06 > > > > Abstract: > > > > This document discusses an IPv6 deployment scenario when individual > > clients connected to large broadcast networks (such as enterprise > > networks or public Wi-Fi networks) are allocated unique prefixes via > > DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation (DHCPv6-PD). > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03.html > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-device-03 > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > v6ops mailing list > > v6ops@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > > > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-… internet-drafts
- [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-per-d… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Joel Halpern
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Joel Halpern
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Joel Halpern
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] Continuing WGLC: ietf-v6ops-dhcp-pd-p… Jen Linkova