IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 21 February 2014 10:13 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A201A0488 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:13:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHMQX9nXhzUy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8751A0509 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 02:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2BD879C; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A7A9A; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:13:02 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402211104570.15054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402211111560.15054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20140214091302.13219.20624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <8E2A8B56-6F05-4F09-BE7E-651B9CA42458@delong.com> <5300CE32.1050808@gmail.com> <BD473E46-E382-44E6-B474-A56D074318FA@delong.com> <530104B3.3070205@gmail.com> <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com> <20140217110013.GA31822@mushkin> <62FF9B8A-2F21-4FDD-B1D2-82B8C02A21B3@delong.com> <37638184-17C6-4C8B-86B1-C596A5A5504A@nominum.com> <530242C3.4070108@bogus.com> <E91E49CA-7BA6-4DA3-B4F3-46BB0F25F8F1@delong.com> <5303CD3E.1010907@gmail.com> <m2a9dnr4vk.wl%randy@psg.com> <5304BAAF.60608@gmail.com> <53052B43.2070904@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2fyZ9FezX5dh=P-PiruiOqKBKO9f5hroD-CHDJS+ZMQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5305FFFD.5090708@foobar.org> <530606FB.9020707@umn.edu> <CAKD1Yr11Zs=zQsVeHyFexRYchsf6DazpGoK6n0NJvMRvpDyd9w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402202117450.15054@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr00-KX8OYgxfpNtdhRXtD1gCTVJ1CZdMmpXYvJ1fzFaUg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402211104570.15054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mJkH_IqBABor19JNnxCcEkOGP6g
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:13:30 -0000

On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> I am worried about this as well, because old-style RFC3484 devices will 
> probably rely on ICMP unreachables and happy eyeballs to avoid giving a 
> super crappy user experience when accessing dual stack resources on the 
> Internet. I welcome further research into this topic.

Gah, clarification: I meant when IPv4 Internet connectivity is up, but 
IPv6 GUA isn't available, meaning RFC3484 style devices with RFC1918+ULA.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email