Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077761B2ACF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bfCy3tbeoaxK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851161B2AC4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1427; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1431391780; x=1432601380; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=RJaOhhe+q0+kXvhJYyMSxgCsWEr6Hx34QBawbo00x8g=; b=Pd+sPeX2a6jHpflkC7pwf0uDAjgZGuwsWO9ceUy2I0M8FZJFmZzcwU27 tbtsQf6X+3kml4mjKrDVI3w+LmJsmJ7DLXYVMFU60Ew1DPkTlMNx3jJAM bG5BaZZ1JB9iOyttLjWWIRSxEh6uJhlXb+s7xagUKhttm4VDS/EMBK+Os g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AQBQCXTVFV/4QNJK1cgw9UXgbFBIFahgMCgTk6EgEBAQEBAQGBCoQgAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IFggNyHcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEaizmFBQeDF4EWBZJAggWBPIcjllojYYMWbwGBRIEBAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,411,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="149060570"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2015 00:49:39 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4C0ncWK030513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 May 2015 00:49:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.148]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:49:38 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
Thread-Index: AQHQjE2FYrn2GrJMIUulEDsLaGATPg==
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:49:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D48CD952-7E44-4E23-81B3-F86CE18AAAE6@cisco.com>
References: <E1B62D40-18AE-47D6-9D3F-27F9300AE4B9@magma.ca> <555112D8.3000008@gmail.com> <4FC37E442D05A748896589E468752CAA0CDD4E69@PWN401EA160.ent.corp.bcbsm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FC37E442D05A748896589E468752CAA0CDD4E69@PWN401EA160.ent.corp.bcbsm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.124]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8B0E81BA-0BAC-4AA7-A69C-3179C34090B9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mMPScj3O5jKEHT-TbdmUrHeIAWM>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:49:41 -0000

> On May 11, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Ackermann, Michael <MAckermann@bcbsm.com> wrote:
> 
> But the reason I would even ask, is that EIGRP deployment within Enterprise/Corporate Networks, is nearly ubiquitous.   These are the same large networks that need guidance and motivation to get serious about IPv6 deployment.

A web page dated 2008:

http://www.techtutorials.net/articles/ipv6_training_cisco_how_to_enable_ipv6_eigrp.html