IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)

Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 28 January 2021 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4173A0E53; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:43:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SasnvzJi-Ub0; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:43:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582F83A0E52; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id a8so5304677lfi.8; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:43:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UmLJEWVEON6EsWEiuhqxPAp0ORXgwmOfJhPtW/pnD3Y=; b=iUVxlj53fyEvkLSdq48bWDRIVcwLfag5TSF18Evei4V4vmwGs2LhWYieZw7Cx4SPvu URREXcUcjgMzuX45UzL7cZWWzQgkbmFMaMuVl+GAJY/5RpQflIzhEBBoA4d3+2EfQKRu KAeWVJ/igZHJDD/8+f4HmNF/ztH04aFReF0u5bho6PcV/yN270UlkXBMDx+2SQdujhG9 S9m0AxDQbGTtPsCWb/PrX7FWolXtdB1BTV5m7htN+LlrYW9sE1o6nvyMm+/mqWtL+N8w XspUQwrmsYc/q5GWBl+R5Im8DZeRZLkOImgKnP80JdADSfwhW8E278aDGkIE1kit6ora TCSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UmLJEWVEON6EsWEiuhqxPAp0ORXgwmOfJhPtW/pnD3Y=; b=IzgiC2DM31p5FwCdMBgYebixu34Z/VE8neioi3DptU2isN1EZae2S1RQ0IdDQOkn2n sWQETBXD8SnCx5e3VnXFSpKEK1GeKmrdTzZW9O5KYsbtZ/uKBadKirA1GxauALUKTcSU HHxDvhfrZSuSbSGBCXRxUIco3hVt+Qq2i+zRPF26clbMgztFZFaDyJbQ0aTgDtAblMSa if4aSeJloaqhwOm+s5DK+BzeAdbaa6APyc4hOiHqJzoZl1VwkLO+3SQdZGZ+FPdWv7Xl y8LMUHrcCK+wHBcO/SEtwbiQj2XfvOqfk7nZJK30ki0GdWpZLGYqohIBuy1KQ9/0n+Dx 7ARg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BIPpKaM97YdeJaycG5z2uwdsVjbPKtOOK+hnu0U9NCLatkWp3 sPXBFk0pjNirn9ziWN4f0vzBKagPjXgxqkWCKHM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQqqp2wc0uIV5mVMqg1oMoJWJvqWfuZJE/3zBe5c6XA6aCg4drs7NMB18ovAUREA8RA1iroSU/KVsrMgxJVeY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:55aa:: with SMTP id y10mr2250474lfg.156.1611794592918; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:43:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160325603610.17357.6914550111489766157@ietfa.amsl.com> <cf025acf-5192-d9a3-a727-8716d9d7b232@si6networks.com> <C68DC427-85A4-4AE7-928A-C92AD2C4488A@fugue.com> <9404f657-dbcb-877d-5a3f-1f3408c3b890@si6networks.com> <30262C9F-D004-4452-9F40-A407D7B396D3@fugue.com> <85f2bc3f-51f5-a5b2-53cd-9b5a52ac227f@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <85f2bc3f-51f5-a5b2-53cd-9b5a52ac227f@si6networks.com>
From: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:43:01 +1300
Message-ID: <CANMZLAZPWCGOvTbiD04eRrJ6WSZWYObBCiWUiStAKdQD=J6d8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, v6ops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000296e8705b9eb2c33"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mRF4onSP_11yHH_dM0Kng_b-ywM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:43:18 -0000

Mentioning Updated & Obsoleted RFCs in the Abstract has been standard
practice for years now. I believe the logic was that although redundant the
warning increases the odds that people will take note.

Regards
    Brian
    (via tiny screen & keyboard)

On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 11:28 Fernando Gont, <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> On 27/1/21 19:06, Ted Lemon wrote:
> > Oh, you don’t need to say “updates” in the abstract because that’s in
> > the header.
>
> I added that to the Abstract because I was *asked* to. You see what I
> mean? :-)
>
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email