IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 23 February 2015 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5371A1ADF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8efmbKzkpcn3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F75B1A1AC7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 644C2A2; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:16:29 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1424700989; bh=DgzHkXFKfQpq6KfWIWRhgpZEUgbGHKoiwspH/I2/wco=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=x5mYZdOdAyyUitXet66Bq7bkDwQJ4Qr5s4aMt9kIqzu+mpQiOLym5bG1Ucisl9+W7 RoTB87+6o0f748+3cMSuP9wxYx/rlSGTpumqJwAjv3X5z/63xTFdscUHOd68t0LmP0 xtneyFEXTbpCbC0w2miMTBFSoVjJlWhoPFp70vEA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE1DA1; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:16:29 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:16:29 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1Zsy2PBGLLi6trssAkY6nX==5jQLyodnWz_+H1BmXaPA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502231515290.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502201513320.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004912254@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr3A6fzgTauLz+Yxe-xOLeDLZ5bzKBo-XyWU4i9LBSAM9Q@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049122B6@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr1c74gbnR51caf_WTKi7FFTbJP0KhwwXtabsvNhiE2Lgw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049124F0@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D11092F8.1AD6E%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com> <CAKD1Yr1ZG_rOZLCXtOjeNwAHbKzcnuRzUhitznp-5J0RP4CV9w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502231459150.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr1Zsy2PBGLLi6trssAkY6nX==5jQLyodnWz_+H1BmXaPA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mSUOP2OFAq_kGrxxDJy9iFrA964>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:16:32 -0000

On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:

>> How else should the network signal to the UE that it should bring up a 
>> second PDP context?
>
> Why would you ever want to do this? It has terrible scaling properties and
> no fate sharing.

Because that's the way MMS is commonly done as well, as well as VoLTE. 
It's the basic model how QoS is supposed to work in 3GPP networks.

The fact that historically vendors have charged on a per-PDP-context basis 
doesn't mean it doesn't work.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email