[v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-rfc7084bis
Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com> Thu, 22 August 2024 09:46 UTC
Return-Path: <contact@daryllswer.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5DFC1CAE73 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=daryllswer.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FM8IoTWNhY3M for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E54C1D4A9B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-202146e9538so5331015ad.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=daryllswer.com; s=google; t=1724320005; x=1724924805; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GL/S8QQXmx4OMAPn6k7l7qZO9E6U1g12YCuZnSA7T5o=; b=Kb6gMH0WBWhO5RmY84YnwFT0oLN/Df2ac4GRO0bbmQnQPtALa1EmUtGwPTzlPxo5yA 5GtAx5Pjgj9dAuf6s+LOp6FBPElYCWQFvYwPJELqS6gTfBTgNuy235kNVAajlGFXKyEc ZZv+ntTS94bOTdDqnkYdtwcqSQ0AmKz/mE1kkno9EQimYcU9lLxlUlPRezDsvWJ/0Yma o3MH/L5RUdlLub+xEx1BfKxH5lDxwcBs1gJMOYQkobEGQWikH+a0DJy5v2sPhCzHyWBZ 0A2BUp84SWtreKFfMx5TTqw0ekYdJKUdfaLw2qtWV9xcM8vCzJLFhWxmtY7NdGA+OqdF DYaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724320005; x=1724924805; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GL/S8QQXmx4OMAPn6k7l7qZO9E6U1g12YCuZnSA7T5o=; b=ulhqen5/QbIxxCX5+5FS7OQVCre723PB0aXeFPW+pe3mBPEmNAFHWSszjXMu6XImak RvouVBnzxH8GsgG167FPvPqlSl3tdUsnWqKKDfxTinWFsDXML3+2RS5LnDZv/snVhkK/ c9QSlcXyNEla5RoHBxk7UP++68icM7iUf2SZuc2cwAsLkY8jD0LYxwwEgFQZcQK3/YWv ayMouYDAoZKEQBYiTwhmvrBu1HLtMXm4S2Xkbl1CYiIeviKdBqaxJghutnKCs+GO75tu u6cfOroE7FZSiJ8bc27eZI8Cw93J2hbQ1RCWvqMSjZxWtRUVXU+Gyw1PEKV5rBe2Mht+ 850g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWrjlTgPYlgQ56s9k5lHb94rkul4QxiNWu24FII1uzF4F0sMhjyDqn+xWaDQx8sjyUBcVfNjg==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx56qQouHKHXiRfiFGy8o2a60pyFv2UGS59hLZZTFvs1yqPBP2Q KTvLkJeetr/u6JV/Le+FUj7nbIxczRhAuDwzfCjXatXg5NkGuO4Wy/ARoHcXN+9o9ye8ZNkAu6D R9wc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHeA8D6exwM84STJvHdt+N1zbd9HlTYuGlL9Ug0NfPLvZLKs2dnsGTrd+eaapXfVVHODrUbAg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dac6:b0:1fb:57e7:5bb4 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20388b3afa8mr16598485ad.37.1724320004942; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com (mail-pj1-f51.google.com. [209.85.216.51]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-20385565468sm8995755ad.11.2024.08.22.02.46.44 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d3d0b06a2dso479573a91.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVIftPnuzHXRlPXwsQxJYojYgY1WeFozw2VJ2Ob0mV6ue4mrRan2DMnjwmOqiNOahv5P4cUOg==@ietf.org
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6fc1:b0:2cf:c9df:4cc8 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2d61728e621mr1544677a91.38.1724320004169; Thu, 22 Aug 2024 02:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACMsEX_DBMNmoC-fzkoG=kifrRh6SFeCJnWiO3-z0QQk-f6xcg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=3OHdhUe5xSTB=N0Gwrdx91RGnqqrVU_Ck3g+Xo9jw60_kzg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG=3OHdhUe5xSTB=N0Gwrdx91RGnqqrVU_Ck3g+Xo9jw60_kzg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daryll Swer <contact@daryllswer.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:16:08 +0530
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACyFTPF8X+G+HwvhmWeKwCiwh1jMDNK8RQLofQOdjhABbYoc0g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACyFTPF8X+G+HwvhmWeKwCiwh1jMDNK8RQLofQOdjhABbYoc0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000053f15806204289dd"
Message-ID-Hash: X7EQMBPF7Y4O72FQDH64V6F2NNGGYY7H
X-Message-ID-Hash: X7EQMBPF7Y4O72FQDH64V6F2NNGGYY7H
X-MailFrom: contact@daryllswer.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-rfc7084bis
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mV3oJmKAObMFnOzaOzD-bdIFoys>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>
I support adoption for this, but I feel this specific text below, will only validate ISPs' poor excuse of enforcing dynamic ia_pd for the everyday home user: G-5: By default, if the IPv6 CE router is an advertising router and > loses its IPv6 default router(s) and/or detects loss of > connectivity on the WAN interface, it MUST explicitly > invalidate itself as an IPv6 default router on each of its > advertising interfaces by immediately transmitting one or more > Router Advertisement messages with the "Router Lifetime" field > set to zero [RFC4861]. *--* Best Regards Daryll Swer Website: daryllswer.com <https://mailtrack.io/l/fafee317f562688fceedbdcc68dae5ce4bc1056e?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.daryllswer.com&u=2153471&signature=5bbe1daf8c07c208> On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 18:47, Eduard Metz <etmetz@gmail.com> wrote: > Support adoption - important to keep this document current, intend to > review. > > cheers, > Eduard > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 5:32 PM Nick Buraglio < > buraglio@forwardingplane.net> wrote: > >> All, >> >> This message begins a Call For Adoption for >> draft-winters-v6ops-rfc7084bis. Please read the draft and send your >> comments in response to this email. >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-winters-v6ops-rfc7084bis/ >> >> The call for adoption will close on August 30, 2024. >> >> Thanks! >> nb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org >> > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org >
- [v6ops] Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops-rfc… Nick Buraglio
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Tim Chown
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Ted Lemon
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Bob Hinden
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Eduard Metz
- [v6ops] Re: Adoption call for draft-winters-v6ops… Daryll Swer