Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Mon, 14 September 2020 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE2F3A0417 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwiNXhht7E_N for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-AM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am6eur05olkn2021.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.91.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612793A03FB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YGtboLf7+XRL3thMS1gRrMB7XYhGvM5zpg5ZeAZitY/ZRYpY3q4WD8krIZxFl0qZi6l12X8K/fuqdR1/juEMu3mc7TZ6jekid8ieAxzWNHV6EIRpwYgI92twq+/fFfjk+otZLCkE+XlhXQrlURhupRqEJoRy3W0bDugFmIoKecnjsuNgramQ3h3Ll6uw7Fo4mmSU8vxh6KE91kjLu3JlaG0iW+ePltkrUtRHoFyp4ZLGVkb1fal4KyibZjgFpb2V8dzGz8zePNeaW248CvRJ22QF18KxFhK43QJx7HZ6coQZ7hF8Xlgeg9eFpjFxSgI+KBrTTzEncfP3sTXO7OlckQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9XXLS8Bi1JYfyZfMFzr0TuPkeNJ0Djash4w2JnbXmn4=; b=M11Xf46G/j0sqF18Pg9uH7/5yGQ3E9HV9DgcjnuC8SWkUeb4SDvPvUPW4CzCsAVcjJ1+tIKtX38zayLA48/q4pNM7r0u65YflfQ6eHxitepgcAvtoTzIfHohnq2osWaWpIWpPkWFat9AlHeik3bkIZdetK9c7zyQN4OwiRBBLekTjlem2umvpzeKpgbtURZG5HG8qo0GRIeH7qoeVeBHPRsYqDW9MO0wmGKEDEkvQYw07HWGAqbUAQpjylvEFFZX8BpZWddpPmSabF4XP03P5xyw/uLChd5FRhLNSFsGrNdDLsLdvclq9NeDtQaOguQ6VkS9+USwnvU8BavrPTnoGw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9XXLS8Bi1JYfyZfMFzr0TuPkeNJ0Djash4w2JnbXmn4=; b=XgtROPC0pPE+BSHGy7CQS+KaWZWnRS3IhqrHOF8J8H9EkI7VlKgAr5SIsOhs8kj86BLiKhaU3nKR8O18RTqBjAb88pn1ekV3hKFOpH4Op0sKE892fRvrExHHUGfEbY5jA/Gqy11NoBOGFqoZIFsEPVB5XiU5TbdCPwpKb4eurLkZt/w16HnaCwr7s7mHQRathIirWJdNrqexoWAKNwE6HcAEMV7972Q+oehdfNE0RugY4uL3IziGS1qpGykYUpYIYl3jqy83qfkd+rIwpJwg/a59Ymg1f5gsmn+1Ok72XClF+OaxveY/CK2PgVw4MmnRuOr0P4xU+oxHTOpa9M1d1A==
Received: from AM6EUR05FT043.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc11::49) by AM6EUR05HT218.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc11::86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:55:17 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:fc11::42) by AM6EUR05FT043.mail.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:fc11::429) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3370.16 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:55:17 +0000
Received: from VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8]) by VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::89f6:7540:e834:ffb8%5]) with mapi id 15.20.3370.019; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:55:17 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lencse_G=E1bor?= <lencse@hit.bme.hu>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
Thread-Index: AQHWiT43LYhHc7LQV0ie1xfS7y0F1aloGfGQgAAENwCAAAu+gIAAAGeQ
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:55:17 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1P194MB0285FCDBFB6A86DF954D1782AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk> <4fa01d01-bc2e-0f01-77f1-13dd4f6f2430@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <4fa01d01-bc2e-0f01-77f1-13dd4f6f2430@hit.bme.hu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:20D1EC6087B048C80BE5E7632A0F9A5C0C920DE32E7FCBC23350882D8F8A21B2; UpperCasedChecksum:814CD7A7356F79C5B1E66E819F07D6997E8ADE77454F17690D9FAC9A77BB59EF; SizeAsReceived:3060; Count:42
x-tmn: [lL2BhA3SuaRENtsfPzAlWkI79KMg7Ftp]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 42
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1d48d31e-6cf1-4bf8-1560-08d858b5cfe6
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6EUR05HT218:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lg9FgOB5kUoWalNmntnvl8Dt6WUx26kzZI8KFh2PS+e10WAPsAUwc0x0Zwna7IqSrMeE+hClumV7KuzHH6kkMui9tMcf30rY8JITdr6Cibch2N9KZvElgM5xMllQy8AQBvZtk5HTV7LaG8ax+0k+yJcjvzt1sKM54IOUee91OWzRIbMyTq0mSUds9lYbJ9l3c65bzcnQfGimk6JGJK6gUQyIgePQmmZvJklXALH3p+4=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: KdtlgURwOIimrR5OWAmX/IgQgpufw6tTEDqsEIjlY9QPWvg3k4hQuBEmVbd1pAt3T2I/6AAKb/xdz6R2j5uW0S+URovbpgzFxbX4tQ/yKql3DHBki8GPNZg3wvDjmMpvOBVMLFteoXMVPDHur68yXQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: AM6EUR05FT043.eop-eur05.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1d48d31e-6cf1-4bf8-1560-08d858b5cfe6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Sep 2020 13:55:17.2562 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6EUR05HT218
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/9rEy1Eirr-JpIBvadPsR0oJjX-4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:55:21 -0000

Hi,

Don't copy the opinion that was mentioned there, use your own mind and give a clear opinion to make the discussion beneficial.

Maybe they have their own reasoning.

Best regards,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lencse Gábor
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:52 PM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Simon, you are completely right: this thing has already been discussed on int-area mailing list in 2017. It was pointed out that the name was misleading, as well as that this solution was not at all viable as an
IPv6 transition mechanism.

I do not see any reason to reiterate the topic on this mailing list.

Best regards,

Gábor

14/09/2020 15:09 keltezéssel, Simon Hobson írta:
> Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>>> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
> I only had a quick look, but doesn't this just re-hash discussions/documentation that's already been done elsewhere ?
> Also, I think calling it IPv10 is just asking to cause confusion - it 
> should be rejected just for that ;-)
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops