IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EEA21A0158 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-JZZlu2sBoe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22e.google.com (mail-yk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B31F1A010E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykax123 with SMTP id x123so58899493yka.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cD1Nyovubhd2hWGnEIc6sS0pvQVisBbmXdzVGaXcomQ=; b=F+qpqQPU6tVRBgm10TX7kOvn/+b7uWpE8MI9rviWZj0oF88WzoOzF672hjYprB5cwP 3WT3II4S2sKPtCoeDy6VAAU26HdiGj+crDFKbJd3LLREj915HDlbRq9r1eUyiJytvBRh VLZH880/sJj+z0Svlop53TS206bFIW9VYKRJ/DURWmNYonAQGitw4dGilw8TINZgJoT6 lXmVf5pp/Y9p2/P687J2qbKr5ljRyqYJDuKRxHI4bjycMpYU5fwIysu0Zuz6kq8B24Fe s1DYsj4Tcv+nLQWYh1s9dce804ve5QLXnSk3HBKiRlsPvKmcce/dEhdgsSt0IBCm0zck Cghg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cD1Nyovubhd2hWGnEIc6sS0pvQVisBbmXdzVGaXcomQ=; b=KeJlSgBsdePYQPA793GoJAXuMrgYFcvqAlpkbFp8IPGX7NyH3uHJRTBy1kQQmyCGA8 zuNR9TaabHBiKjUkt4WgEb6uVRkco296RJrik+Lq/4sCwoR+ifUlgQscHd288MM2PPM/ LqxU450gQNLR6YeWlBAgA18+272z69OSNHWvjZxlkscZukhe9Xcaba7Vh09KeNGhcrPD ENE/eSoR4IB0WhBtXxjCjDcuzG2tV+ymms8ok0MYXclxkO9ws0hggaRl+aOFXeV9tG+1 9xI/D39G+7l1bvz5yDu4a3UiIhPsjjH+uce62eGvu+dckBQkJty0VMWeLcNrKDEG3bl/ Py8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeBsyfyE2BJ6Meoar8AjIqz+ImLPNQTb6FHPX5CzTIos/4/Cv/cccZSA+wJXpsHaVJ71j+
X-Received: by 10.170.91.3 with SMTP id i3mr27429508yka.25.1437963104321; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.8.201 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1ZIZ4w-0000CbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <20150723130715.12113.47480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55B1ED14.6030501@gmail.com> <m1ZIZ4w-0000CbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:11:24 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2z6T86gmQMPZwbgFB4mdt7=xWNuei5jaQg=vpG7-zLVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a05e80910ec051bd1e0a8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/mZovTiS8Z1F3Jr6hYjK8Bqo5FDs>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:11:46 -0000

In practice, in a homenet network it will make sense to use SLAAC instead
of DHCPv6 PD. The recommendation for PD is to use DHCPv6 PD if a network
"requires explicit requests for address space", i.e., if SLAAC is not
available.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
wrote:

> Random question: how you doing DHCP PD interact with Homenet's HNCP?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email