Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04: (with COMMENT)

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303233A13FC; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZB67-P9sMeWN; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 636983A13FA; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:b9c:69b8:4602:916c:a007]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99CF72845ED; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum@ietf.org, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
References: <160322952602.3916.9135001094597388319@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <f6bbf5e9-ce2c-fd1f-5c3e-bd4ca6f33adc@si6networks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:57:34 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <160322952602.3916.9135001094597388319@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/me9IqR5aOFAyJycsdMgzgN44U8E>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:58:51 -0000

Hello, Roman,

Thanks so much for your comments! In-line...

On 20/10/20 18:32, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks to Klaas Wiereng for the SECDIR review.
> 
> ** Section 6.  As Section 3.2 is proposing tuning the parameters in RFC4861, it
> is likely worth reiterating that these security considerations still apply

Not sure what you mean. The security considerations in RFC4861, or 
something else?


> 
> ** Editorial
> -- Section 1.  Editorial. s/and and/and/

Thanks! Will fix this.

Thanks!

Cheers,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492