IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 27 July 2015 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7262F1AD2F2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BRnVpZN1gf7Y for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72CBF1A3B9B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DF360980 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:12:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02E2160678 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:12:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 76426 invoked by uid 1007); 27 Jul 2015 11:12:41 +0200
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:12:41 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Message-ID: <20150727091241.GL84167@Space.Net>
References: <20150723130715.12113.47480.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55B1ED14.6030501@gmail.com> <m1ZIZ4w-0000CbC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAKD1Yr2z6T86gmQMPZwbgFB4mdt7=xWNuei5jaQg=vpG7-zLVg@mail.gmail.com> <m1ZJdjZ-0000CcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m1ZJdjZ-0000CcC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/msSjkqO-t1bsbA7wOV60bLzqyDI>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-colitti-v6ops-host-addr-availability-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:12:47 -0000

Hi,

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:26:05AM +0200, Philip Homburg wrote:
> In your letter dated Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:11:24 +0900 you wrote:
> >In practice, in a homenet network it will make sense to use SLAAC instead
> >of DHCPv6 PD. The recommendation for PD is to use DHCPv6 PD if a network
> >"requires explicit requests for address space", i.e., if SLAAC is not
> >available.
> 
> I didn't keep track, did homenet explictly pick SLAAC over DHCPv6?

DHCPv6 or DHCPv6-PD?  You're mixing terms...

For hosts, SLAAC is used, for non-homenet routers behind a homenet,
DHCPv6-PD.  Not sure about DHCPv6 for hosts, though.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email