IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Thu, 20 October 2011 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D309821F8B54 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.345
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.255, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jwnkk992XfD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E99721F8B4C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.137] (173-167-0-106-michigan.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.167.0.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.12.9) with ESMTP id p9KIDDis017553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jared@puck.nether.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3031FD29C@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:23 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46726B00-1592-4F0B-9E95-960D1645E6D8@puck.nether.net>
References: <4E974F1A.2030008@forthnetgroup.gr><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3030A4156@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130390@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><4E98CCB2.2050100@forthnetgroup.gr><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3031303D8@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><4E994515.6020204@forthnetgroup.gr><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130B54@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130C12@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><4E9E8706.6050006@forthnetgroup.gr><39D5D616-6E56-46B1-B773-437184567E60@employees.org><CAKD1Yr3SRRjk4fjg1WkUZSQ6rRT2+dY5p-wjtEiA5SFvx4kqGA@mail.gmail.com><0F5D8352-7A20-46BF-867B-DBBF36CF0B01@apple.com><4EA04F5F.1010809@unfix.org> <18D34AC6-ABD2-48CB-8F33-EEBEB9BF8263@puck.nether.net> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3031FD29C@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
To: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:13:15 -0000

On Oct 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Jared Mauch
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:50 PM
> To: Jeroen Massar
> Cc: IPv6 Operations; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
> 
> 
>> This is a long war against the firewall culture that we are unlikely to
> win.  The less clued out there continue to set local security policies
> in a way that >break and inhibit the proper use of technology.  While
> this may seem defeatist, we should certainly continue to educate these
> folks.
> 
> See RFC 4890, section 4.3.1.  
> 
> Hemant

Yeah, but try to make someone who says "i'm from IT/Security" i'm here to help read/know what a RFC is.

Lost cause in most cases.  These are the same folks who think that TCP/53 is just for zone transfers and will keep their head in the sand about dnssec/edns0 too.

- jared

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email