Re: [v6ops] State of play

I will confer with Gunter and advise by email to the WG.  Either way a new
I-D will likely appear to carry some of the content that is in the current
draft.

John
+1-484-962-0060

-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Monday, January 4, 2016 at 13:33
To: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] State of play

>No problem. When you next submit an update for
>draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, the tool will ask you
>whether it replaces any existing drafts. If you say "yes, it replaces
>draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host", the individual submission
>will drop out of the list the IETF tools give me.
>
>There is another option, though. On the list, you discussed excising some
>Comcast-specific elements from The WG draft, making that draft be
>entirely about the generalized type of service (which seems like a good
>idea). One option would be to keep the Comcast-specific parts in
>draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host, which continues to exist.
>Another obvious option would be to file those under a new draft name, in
>which case I would argue that the WG draft replaces the individual one.
>
>Your call. Either way works for me.
>
>> On Jan 3, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Brzozowski, John
>><John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Fred,
>> 
>> Just to be clear, the following:
>> 
>> 2015-10-19	draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>> 
>> Will no longer be updated since it was accepted as a WG document:
>> 
>> 2015-11-01	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>> 
>> We plan to make updates based on the last WG meeting and email comments
>> for the next IETF.
>> 
>> 
>> John
>> +1-484-962-0060
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Fred Baker
>> <fred@cisco.com>
>> Date: Friday, January 1, 2016 at 09:00
>> To: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [v6ops] State of play
>> 
>>> RFC Editor: EDIT
>>> 	2015-11-23	draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption
>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc
>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
>>> 	2015-10-26	draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam
>>> 
>>> RFC Editor: In ISE Review
>>> 	2015-12-17	draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
>>> 
>>> RFC Editor: RFC-EDITOR
>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
>>> 
>>> WG: Unupdated WG Document
>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
>>> 	2015-07-06	draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
>>> 
>>> WG: Updated WG Document
>>> 	2015-12-10	draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability
>>> 	2015-11-01	draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>> 
>>> WG: WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
>>> 	2015-12-11	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world
>>> 
>>> Individual Submission: Unupdated
>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>> 	2015-10-19	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
>>> 	2015-10-15	draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
>>> 	2015-10-10	draft-bao-v6ops-rfc6145bis
>>> 	2015-09-21	draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack
>>> 	2015-07-06	draft-akira-v6ops-mape-experience
>>> 	2015-07-06	draft-xcf-v6ops-chinatelecom-deployment
>>> 	2015-07-05	draft-hui-v6ops-ipv6trans-select-nfv
>>> 	2015-07-05	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
>>> 	2015-07-05	draft-yang-v6ops-ipv6tran-select
>>> 
>>> Individual Submission: Updated
>>> 	2015-11-05	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>> 
>> 
>