Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Thu, 31 October 2019 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8278C12087A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WhAn_oBuwn_I for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D9E12081E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (unknown [177.27.208.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2209A8679F; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:44:38 +0100 (CET)
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CAO42Z2yQ_6PT3nQrXGD-mKO1bjsW6V3jZ_2kNGC2x586EMiNZg@mail.gmail.com> <B53CE471-C6E8-4DC1-8A72-C6E23154544F@fugue.com> <m1iOk6q-0000IyC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <855496CB-BF7E-41E6-B273-41C4AA771E41@fugue.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <5e0d1da1-4933-069c-68f6-9aa360106582@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:41:28 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <855496CB-BF7E-41E6-B273-41C4AA771E41@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nAGVVYnw1Ltc5txEiURWUUEqvEo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:44:50 -0000

On 27/10/19 14:14, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com
> <mailto:pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>> wrote:
>> If you think that this is an important thing to fix, feel free to 
>> talk about it. But why in this discussion? SEND doesn't do anything for
>> flash renumbering. From an operational point of view, RA-guard is much
>> more attractive then SEND. So it is not clear to me that there is any
>> need for SEND. But I could be wrong. In any case, if there is a need
>> to discuss SEND we could do that separately.
> 
> I think you missed my point.  You can’t do flash renumbering by
> advertising a prefix with a valid lifetime of zero, because that will be
> ignored by hosts.   If it were not ignored by hosts, it would be a very
> effective DoS vector. 

As someone that has played a lot with ND-based DoS vectors, I should say
that you trust RAs, or you don't. If you do, all bets are off. ("sudo
apt-get install ipv6toolkit;man ra6" and you'll get examples of a bunch
of other DoS attacks that an attacker can perform).

>From an attacker's point of view, you just need one that works.

-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492