Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 07:13 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9211F1A7008 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lprE0oBaUQFL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com (mail-ie0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13B81A6FEE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecat20 with SMTP id at20so1970661iec.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=No+G4gTPtnPIvsfctn9jxap3qr9WytjCHSQoKQd4tAc=; b=HHhTprvrn7k4Z0x4lCUHpatkx7e1b3bixJ7bB+7BcenbmCZjcJToAtbB1lEpeLcsy2 VV+v5L2aImgFwc/dqR5JDizdF+E/RCeqcj13wB+9qsdLlQPAHJKo8wAXuEbfdW5o4IQ4 g0xAnHDgWpddnktUh1bfreB3XoDkFE30XO29oKS4wafum5XLFP97sVaOSi+N5KGi/qkA 2wMoYaDG4hEfYDX5SquFPbJzMJfkR/muZcY2iUA9PTOh+khyzfIp4hFJluNtU+Zw9czH ZwrNVT3xTNvt7PuHTuDX608uC4UqSs6Xz904nEihL2+++Z91aLI6GiaXgtcxtXenutx5 LrXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=No+G4gTPtnPIvsfctn9jxap3qr9WytjCHSQoKQd4tAc=; b=YVtRawkmfPT6Pe8SZiOmetPeoxole+slwPPeIG8lTNsS0BQYtG8mxRfKuxOku7QRIi UzQGw2QT5/wPyUlr2172XFk35q5cjqaRQDeyjhMFOKW1ipK0ccKHZnimszX26oGELA5t 6lWg+XC0JbcCAMIffMXb4O9Ugt9B0Ug9SpOshJJcNiKzm7CD8mawPxuSZEBW/Uo+81Rm DxgYUpCINbuHefZMS8gjkFYsvyvY5/pWaJS5pu5MHhMu/ohmL9oNS72UhSVpTXRsXRVU 6gDA/lCs7H4xP6HGdZY0F5KlEbFNxTtXxIDTkqLrKjMVLf/Ke/sNxxPF3s97FBRboBv8 40aw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkE61yATanYIimAc9DsaMWfJKIJxP3M23LBDVU37nhR9yKuGunsRDh3nSGIpHW2VtAmAeN/
X-Received: by 10.107.154.132 with SMTP id c126mr16646439ioe.74.1423638809873; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908DF9@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BF1BDC61-D8BD-4FB3-A111-070D9FF51F60@cisco.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303DE865D@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004908DF9@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:13:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1CPecjtSM6iUjgy+0hYJGKbwsiSXL-Rs3EreWXg8bAew@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140fc948d58fb050ecabdea
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nJFjz7cA7cobOmvwHF-zQzrq6ko>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:13:32 -0000

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:00 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> Hi Nick,
>
> Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
>
> This is exactly the motivations for which we edited the first version of
> the cellular requirements draft.


Just in case it might have escaped someone's attention, I'd like to point
out that David, Mohamed, Nick and Ross are listed as the authors of this
draft, and that if you're an author of the document, you're probably likely
to agree with the other authors on its content.

As Joel says, it's not my role to declare consensus. But I think that on
this thread I have seen only one statement in support of this document that
was not from an author, and several statements expressing reservations and
lack of support.