Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat

+1

I fully agree with Victor's words as this draft is providing a real solution
to THE IPv4 exhaustion problem. I do support it and would like to see this 
work continued.

Cheers,
Ales

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Victor
> Kuarsingh
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 1:31 AM
> To: fred@cisco.com; v6ops@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
> 
> Fred,
> 
> This work in my mind represents important work that should continue.
> Putting a mobile operator hat on, it provides the last bit of functionally
> to make IPv6 with NAT64 a real and workable option for Wireless
> deployments based on known behaviours in commercially available product
> (I.e. Infrequent, but need for IPv4 connections).
> 
> Given the content in the draft and testing/results provided thus far, it
> appears to be a viable option with a number of benefits (especially in the
> mobile space related to PCC complacence).
> 
> I would support this work in whichever forum (group) it should exist.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Victor K
> 
> 
> 
> On 12-02-15 9:55 AM, "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >A new draft has been posted, at
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat. Please take a look
> >at it and comment.
> >_______________________________________________
> >v6ops mailing list
> >v6ops@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops