IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Sat, 04 February 2017 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAAB12969E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 20:14:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.42
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.42 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24sz2XIcX0sB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 20:14:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0357129695 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 20:14:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CZZ54337; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 04:14:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 04:14:35 +0000
Received: from NKGEML514-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::40a8:f0d:c0f3:2ca5]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 12:14:08 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
Thread-Index: AdJ71bub1L6aUKYaSxmQB+Og32Va4wCxu9Aw
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 04:14:07 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2E9DACD@nkgeml514-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0501MB20515AFB8ECBEB3A930E9B0DAE4A0@BLUPR0501MB2051.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.191.175]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.5895552C.013E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 55cb737b513464200f2a73b855324ae7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/nZ_2djvsUWcaxY5q85Q7iTEjl1k>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 04:14:39 -0000

Hi Ron and all,

Sorry for the late reply, I was just back from the Chinese New Year holidays.

I'll make a new version to see if the WG could make a final consensus. 
Thanks much for all the comments in the mailing list and your guidance on this work.

Best regards,
Bing

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ron Bonica
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 11:23 PM
> To: IPv6 Ops WG
> Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Some time ago, I queried the WG's disposition regarding
> draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-considerations
> (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=v6ops&index=x6OmZJ
> 1n2F0rBX6iq5GHRBHWRO0&gbt=1). I think that the consensus was:
> 
> - Continue as informational
> - Recommend against ULA-only
> - Attempt to find some set of recommendations upon which the WG can
> agree.
> 
> So, if the authors are so disposed, I encourage them to produce a new
> version of the draft, leveraging what we learned during this email thread.
> 
>                                                            Ron
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email