Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

[Yannis Nikolopoulos <[e-mail]>]

Hello Brian,

On 3/31/21 11:05 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yannis,
> On 31-Mar-21 20:25, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
>>
>> On 3/30/21 11:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> On 31-Mar-21 07:33, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
>>>> On 3/28/21 9:47 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>>> Dual stack has no time limit
>>>> (for us ISPs) it has, it painfully has, if your user base is still growing
>>> Isn't that what CGN was invented for? That's the incumbent technology, with IPv4aaS as a new alternative.
>> Yes, but CGN usually implies single stack, hence my comment.
> That isn't clear to me. Maybe I am biased because of the model
> described by https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6264.

well, 6264 (combined with the immaturity of lw4o6) was the inspiration 
we needed to rethink our NAT444 a few years back, so thank you :)

regards,
Yannis
>      Brian
>