Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7041ACD6D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.387
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.387 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEMQ5g88XHVG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB26F1ACD63 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so105606068igb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jkoB0KQwqjN1Sm56qQozyiOYQFc0C06IeW6xVaN+DYg=; b=K/jVSMvv2gZFKFVnLJqui0aAo7RssOwADhYfysHxbpw6ji6H3lHAA5yCp9T5T2WlbV Zo6vYsjg6G/alebtUGylOun4dkcWVFMhaP5RUT7CU9iWJpDrr1wiqnkYApp9WLmAySdo ussUyyKe/s+tFjB5RjsxGlf2DKuK6KsXQWzJZoktHl9wx0q2rtA9cZxR4K8BvfVfLq1M xvZnsFBPvcCuWxfV0JCmS8cZErXnKLnPMq8AS4jgKNrhjcOed/GmwABSzX9QhPvVqTzM x/Wns8PPJSLkL0DH0gcuxv953hqzHvtFbeRNnfg6rwgFvJQsHoIHufh36K2aQ0o/2MXe iMUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=jkoB0KQwqjN1Sm56qQozyiOYQFc0C06IeW6xVaN+DYg=; b=INpwBMKSOP2AvgqYog/77gVbT/zJ3C+AO3Rq14y08e3qxR0Z/L2L8p7KutULsf14xS q5wejOIBExwgK9JYAP5IFW6CGR0eZVVn49eElLVYKBoAE3FkpTTPRhv9Ail6Fi4DE5fK pI4EjfeVC2tEQPq4+9gJdb9sHo7OQ/JtAeuvvIBcblTlzdzJdPtokwK4XijJYD/j/7d0 dkBO9ujpXQ9FaUGLYMXh/VZHUAhgxtAX+5qCYMTb7g0/L6rv1NMjU7JTqPkBMclrktL4 plNV8WVgXiU9xNYFdxYV03WliT0wpijN3vVpOAtaPtSBZ5Qmv67V8fv6Xk9BpFAR99TI h/cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1XpTxB8N3cGSQGKQmUcUI+E82Rn5PjdD3Ftfl/ggvs303YkSQhmIEZl6Zr53EqZrpJ8bh
X-Received: by 10.50.137.97 with SMTP id qh1mr5003139igb.39.1429713874107; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.73.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGR65jtZN4NV62p1XnUgoQRC+h=ELmsLcQaFTdrToMtwRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD6AjGT-hG-uvRQvRosrZtfrf0Nb8ne9jy=tD9oh=5zNM42Xsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcKgK8W+VB1H5EQpHaYiKVYXqOz_2RS-w_CiTf9kL2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe530+OVZrFZVaYh1-zoRDvJhUd0rf4sx6a2nO8SvKmm6zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi140PQ+TF0rED_bQPeS=Fj415qt0-zE2RdGnEL34PAzHyx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjXAeMF6pw5MO2Jrf9B8LJ48D3m1YTVkdBe=_OHjtroQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51TCqU2eMP4LS3DooZxQDAPD95OVJDXbiU7qvuvKCMq+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=zc57+pOA9TFs+0azw0ZR1g67+08T=9eZPHjGXBvgFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe53T_30pj7xxwNs=mWEnd=do6oiq3KgN=U-gHLrLF-gG7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1441574.4C168%wesley.george@twcable.com> <CAD6AjGQrzoBJrqQfKO0N8Ji=oJ-ZP6Sn88sXf=opJ6bYVmTDZg@mail.gmail.com> <552102B0.6070904@cernet.edu.cn> <35D97B17-8E83-43CF-ABEF-122572F1321A@eircom.net> <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe51BDuPhc8wdKGmRiBfSnrz7PMtqYXaoDO+5cwLx_xW2tw@mail.gmail.com> <55290E26.8080500@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe50zz9EtNtifMh+tN9XT-jKCTJB=vsQ6uG515iddOo7f2Q@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8C63A@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <67A2A6E4-0603-4E84-8534-EA6C706C6D5D@lists.zabbadoz.net> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8CBAB@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <0C3D10F1-B8AF-4097-91C6-D92CDDD5978D@nominum.com> <CAD6AjGR65jtZN4NV62p1XnUgoQRC+h=ELmsLcQaFTdrToMtwRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:44:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3LmP2UWpn5xmU8Q-qg_uL-XR-ZMJbj5VS+GfkOadGbcA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3f1f498faab051451333f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/o2UK8mJ6fmcd9KDQsE0yDv2kC1Y>
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:44:38 -0000

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

> Keep in mind, the tool box only includes these 3 things.  Wishing some
> vigilante titan network is going to rain fire down on IPv4-only apps is not
> realistic at all.  Same is true for  "mega-mobile-phone eco-system", they
> will also not bar IPv4-only apps in a timescale that is helpful.  And, they
> too have customers that want to go to http://192.0.1.1 on the public
> internet ... and no, they are not going enroll networks to switch to
> IPv6-only without IPv4-socket support to reach 99% of internet while other
> networks are delivering 100% of the internet.
>

What he said. The only question, really, is whether we end up doing #1 or
#2.