IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0710A1AE20E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BT-8p1W6xdqV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40751AE131 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x13so3336920ief.38 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:06:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=gvpE2UF00ek1CZIfVACHi23EJ5WUAHsIHYpdYwNpcRU=; b=QE5oIsR2jGdI1zngjHTr7PU2dg6ERJkF/rx1Fcjpx+xa/9TDxeyodKxNqpAG6tJtSJ zcosTUbsvi0otUleT4kSZ/SKZPhiTGsYmECxLTED6hEo8L041IofgvJcL7wvJywimYJD of0egHAv+eCrkd7WxXu/wP1H32XF7tV1QGcwDn1p4bR+RYYczBSUSlANQTdbpHSF8Z7c v2Bt0plkMh1WdjNT/gs0bepKEkPNfnFAr6gWw03b/FP/A/en/t4Ksbq76/Pv4/C9tTQw ssaTDlx8CFYrwAcbfKLcLr0UmJ+EqwqzNmqc5BiW1i0g1msEG2AtZ6/KaC9/WAe026oC l0kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gvpE2UF00ek1CZIfVACHi23EJ5WUAHsIHYpdYwNpcRU=; b=ArOmD3u0J4XjBWYZdexidl3UIpiuGhDS2/oylJem6J+69CcZQDDVGMZJ6FmKB8gten xHJu5anyopx29th5MUJkJH4W14vpM0VahKTuXET5ZxPNV2Jlf5cetx9+HCBFixkpkIgv SaC0ANOY/+C9WPL3yEf/ZK7rJMvLKenSTI1qngIf05iLhWLtyMg49Qhh1yKSnbuckGQe 7ZFXUzZX1fYu4LfB/R4e5XvP+6q+MBZLqdDoUOEveKtcMrdxxRcXJf1ZMW+mZ01Ov2Ne K5I2M8xw6xGQeh09VNIDNADvsUvGqvyYKbW46LmTKc+sdeIPK9SjfXiQ5qh8stURRpaU x7EA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkGOPpuiCcLlGDj2/v2fqgPM0eJnMcT1ybeJh+CT+C5rSnaYOfm/oN3bqVIhj6YCgzwuk6/30zIM4eyIFHRxahv3e1cAI2UPNhxz1S9TufVkpzqujnjs1O0yNhmRkjFcp40RnJ3W9n9vqzTO9/uio+1RgQpEBpBd4Gk01KJZEtValdfbAd8cKJI0jSsNRICgQa5gN/V
X-Received: by 10.50.36.67 with SMTP id o3mr2376945igj.47.1389261971118; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:06:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 02:05:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m28uupa8e5.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312080643090.68814@ayourtch-mac> <B561C767-677A-4A37-BA69-EB24951B2817@delong.com> <52A4C6FD.1080504@gmail.com> <98CACA9B-AD61-460A-93AC-D5EEA1176706@delong.com> <CAEmG1=qLxqWdB8JR4rbAS-TyqQtPcGnZvVb7DSBCrmFcrm0vUA@mail.gmail.com> <20140107104001.GM81676@Space.Net> <m2lhyqb354.wl%randy@psg.com> <72626BC4-CB9E-49E8-8A54-48A141F52C0C@nominum.com> <m2k3eab1op.wl%randy@psg.com> <6A64F619-4A0E-423A-A5E7-4C3234B461AE@nominum.com> <m2fvoyb0hd.wl%randy@psg.com> <7F9988DB-00B8-47FF-928A-E346164BEAFD@puck.nether.net> <7183B360-FD11-479E-9361-5A57D42F0308@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1hQsaEMdjvOqgSVjNCxUUrG8BQ+3fLpHzgDs5AuX_19Q@mail.gmail.com> <m28uupa8e5.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 19:05:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2Ay_cBFvKLyv5qOfRDDGwQ-XXf6LtJP80mRJDbPg4SJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0116017449f60804ef86c2ee"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:06:22 -0000

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> > The one-sentence summary is "we want to do it the same way as we do in
> > IPv4".
>
> close.  we want the paying customer to be able to move to ipv6 with as
> little cost and effort as possible.
>
> we know this violates the one true religion.  so did getting rid of tlas
> and 42 other symptoms of arrogance in ipv6.
>

I think the reason that people feel so strongly about it is that they feel
that we as a community can do better than that, and that if we don't strive
to do better than that now, the cumulative effect of operational
familiarity with the old system, lack of developer familiarity, and buggy
implementations  will make it so that the new system cannot be made any
better than the old.

Also, TLAs were a fundamental change to the model. It wouldn't have worked.
By comparison, not having routing in DHCPv6 is trivial, and we know that it
works (even in enterprises).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email