IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3C91A076E; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.253
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.253 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cIDArSwrNb8W; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3491A019F; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:47:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local (c-50-174-18-221.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [50.174.18.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1O0kxQh052366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:47:01 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <530A967D.1080608@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:46:53 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/27.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <12AA6714-4BBE-4ACE-8191-AA107D04FBF4@cisco.com> <m2iosdta7m.wl%randy@psg.com> <2014021811305909988540@chinamobile.com> <CAL9jLaa6fXL+FFNFgdK257dbHGXqm4YBRfMEocoQPEAczPmH-Q@mail.gmail.com> <00d501cf2c6a$36c995d0$a45cc170$@chinamobile.com> <20140218160639.GC12348@pfrc> <m2eh2ylddq.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2eh2ylddq.wl%randy@psg.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nfcj2iFS4m2ipnLAuuK0icEION5EKSHtj"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:47:02 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/oFzme-awj_qk9WZNIOdDnXWmq1o
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Idr] BGP Identifier
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:47:04 -0000

On 2/19/14, 6:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> What I would instead suggest is finding a mechanism by which the
>> unique router-ID can be mapped easily to such addresses.  I don't
>> believe that BGP is the right place to do this.
> 
> we need a name to address mapping mechanism.  let's all think about
> that.  </sarcasm>

routerid rr-type anyone?

that actually doesn't sound like a totally appalling idea.

:p

> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email