Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda

Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com> Tue, 14 October 2014 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <hiromi@inetcore.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E437A1A1A73 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.687
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.687 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fruetjt6Vo1u for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inc.inetcore.com (inc.inetcore.com [IPv6:2403:2000:1:2::28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7371A1A74 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 17:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2403:2000:1:3:a64e:31ff:fe26:a6cc] (unknown [IPv6:2403:2000:1:3:a64e:31ff:fe26:a6cc]) by inc.inetcore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA21F2DD091; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:52:08 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <543C73B8.4060601@inetcore.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 09:52:08 +0900
From: Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0 SeaMonkey/2.29.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <DDCFDE78-07A2-4C0D-B1BD-88456513826C@cisco.com> <54364189.5080905@inetcore.com> <FFDC0FDA-2E2C-4046-AFD5-2D15A063124D@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130901110.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1410130901110.14735@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/oKVrjjBQ277knDkN1Xi8E2SJE-k
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:52:16 -0000

Thanks for the comment.

Yes, the tool is free to obtain. But to keep healthy use of the tool,
JPCERT/CC currently provides it based on requests from Vendors.(and
requester has to sign a kind of an agreement of use policy document)
We think a product will also be available in the end of this year.

This is my personal concern, the tool needs to be customized for
automatic testing and showing more easy to understandable dialogue and
so on.

Regards,

On 2014/10/13 16:05, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> My opinion is that having test suites available as FOSS would be great.
> The tools look like they're of the kind already freely available, but
> actually setting up tests that operators and end users can run against
> their equipment is of great help. I encourage freely available tests of
> all kinds.
> 
> The document lists tests performed but doesn't say if the tools will be
> available, so that's a question from me to the author.
> 
> I would like to see protocol fuzzers etc also be available, if possible.
> We have way too few of these freely available.
> 
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> 
>> I would be interested in working group opinions on this note. Is it
>> useful to the operators?
>>
>> On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear chairs,
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I submitted "draft-jpcert-ipv6vullnerability-check-00" today.
>>> If v6ops gives a 3 to 5 minutes for me, I would like to talk about this.
>>>
>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jpcert-ipv6vullnerability-check/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> P.S. I am still working on this.... until the deadline comes...
>>>
>>> On 2014/10/07 9:09, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
>>>> As I mentioned last week, Lee and I are pulling together an agenda
>>>> for IETF 91. The drop-dead date for new or updated drafts is 27
>>>> October, and frankly it will work better if drafts arrive earlier -
>>>> as we are looking for working group commentary on them.
>>>>
>>>> Current state of play:
>>>>
>>>> IESG:
>>>>    Jul 31  draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6
>>>>    Sep  1  draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
>>>>
>>>> IETF Last Call:
>>>>    Sep 26  draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
>>>>
>>>> Working Group Document updated since IETF:
>>>>    Sep 18  draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
>>>>
>>>> Individual Submission updated since IETF:
>>>>    Aug 24  draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
>>>>            On list, Ray Hunter suggests someone write "a draft
>>>> summarizing the ICMP PTB problem"
>>>>    Sep 10  draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world
>>>>            There has been some discussion on-list.
>>>>    Sep 15  draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat
>>>>            No list commentary
>>>>    Sep 18  draft-elkins-v6ops-multicast-virtual-nodes
>>>>            Some commentary, not supportive
>>>>    Sep 18  draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery
>>>>            A fair amount of discussion, mostly anti-NAT.
>>>>    Sep 25  draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack
>>>>            no list commentary
>>>>    Oct  5  draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc
>>>>            Some list commentary
>>>>
>>>> Working Group Document NOT updated since IETF:
>>>>    Jun 18  draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
>>>>    Jul  4  draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
>>>>
>>>> Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF:
>>>>    Apr  7  draft-smith-v6ops-mitigate-rtr-dos-mld-slctd-node
>>>>    Jul  3  draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
>>>>    Jul  4  draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi
>>>>    Jul  4  draft-yourtchenko-chown-rupik-v6ops-dad-3x
>>>>    Jul 20  draft-wang-v6ops-flow-label-refelction
>>>>    Jul 21  draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance
>>>>
>>>> more data at
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?sort=status&activedrafts=on&name=v6ops
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list
>>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ---------------
>>> Ruri Hiromi
>>> INTEC Inc.
>>
>>
> 


-- 
===================================
株式会社インテック
先端技術研究所 研究開発部
廣海(ひろみ)緑里