IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] HE Reporting (draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00)

Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com> Sat, 21 October 2017 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D6C134463 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCdinCWOPJpQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C156A134218 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r129so14882600lff.8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=kih0TCvNiqabhyu+PLLQJ5ZTQN7qjNYwsLt5gNh0WA8=; b=u6Dn6OGPBQ7o+ZV7FDTogxa1Gc94D7yACCfpsK7vd0jd9cCbV0QhoirsGbPC7z9zPY Vv5DqtjaKu9LlwPJnEDEucrSySi1oQqAXpMNBgS0JQGm5/v6H1fvzRwh7oQB1uvvj22V 9D++a4dqzHtuM7Sfd5l5EFlteLMVHdifsoZK6HxvvfpxToWhfyIkx39nvpmFcHLXOTbm TJHIo+BwSdEFdNudn/amrbaeiONrbTcGi0htfNg/xC5Y4lClCL2H71ydMlk8V/1KEKol tE455z6wrTT/hZGFt6Qnz7qQVfCl/TbvG8/LedldLRMMZlu3InPqzhrpQeyHlCltvtnR L1pg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kih0TCvNiqabhyu+PLLQJ5ZTQN7qjNYwsLt5gNh0WA8=; b=p7sBi5OGx8ivhKMtyUUL5iGrOxfCMwRuv/n1QfvLm43bmZOKeIXF753Xe44upb9Qq0 OOIAUkkbWEChGvdLpg3RJPNYXAzrt+8bal9o5vkacva9A26Uq/u3/tjpu9lBxkGMeV/6 cktNI2KOpPW18EG5XjKtsTFLIBqpN6lozSPpkW3+dApEinG8460WTapvlP6VSk4Tcamu P5dp+Knk9G/+0eLTD00ZU6yzufc8Wmpq/Nt9Ma3CZp7346sCmDSlB5/OR1pnyzI4K8qB 3Ak15K575YsH+gTtPeAR7Va/YT99KcPm15BnXe/FjxGWWzFxEQIKpE6DFr+RXCFL39ml 8WKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUJg+aCVqmrF62UeJO3fYibt8Dmw9ODi047cWZfUXB0GkkNed+Z rq6LPNd8EPrZcgbhzqL1tDoZ4JSYo+T+hEFLOfA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q4b+LwFJnJiQhLnYcGmoCa6C885JXs622aRizCRpF+k+pHH7s2w6PNCsRtbAsktEMKu44y6M594u6fNdDMebU=
X-Received: by 10.46.83.73 with SMTP id t9mr2939039ljd.68.1508549424867; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.91.202 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 18:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: carlos@lacnic.net
In-Reply-To: <1EB9B021-D344-4229-84F6-A41388892C2B@gmail.com>
References: <4ED79F88-1E2A-41D2-BC24-6844E62688E9@gmail.com> <1EB9B021-D344-4229-84F6-A41388892C2B@gmail.com>
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 22:30:24 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+z-_EVBU=uX99z2yyJNoc8TZc8LooagB+uHdgKgk5i2ms8xKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1cf73c986e2c055c04883d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/oMtitLEAQlMjgzSCR7bNPJQC5zc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] HE Reporting (draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 01:30:29 -0000

Well, sure, I guess I am. I'd like to see this further pursued. Jordi what
say you ?

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Happy to see additional discussion. We’re assessing the agenda for IETF
> 100; are you proposing a topic there?
>
> Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
>
> On Oct 18, 2017, at 12:20 PM, Carlos M. Martinez <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I’d like to propose we have some additional discussion on
> draft-palet-ietf-v6ops-he-reporting-00. Particularly I’d like to separate
> the problem itself from the solution proposed.
>
> I believe it’s a problem worth addressing and would provide useful
> information for operators working on and troubleshooting their early IPv6
> deployments.
>
> From my recollections of the last discussions there were some concerns
> regarding the solution the draft actually proposes. I’d like to re-start
> the discussion on that particular topic:
>
>    - what properties should the solution have ?
>    - what is the minimal set of information that a device could report
>    that is useful for network troubleshooting ?
>
> thanks!
>
> /Carlos
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>


-- 
--
=========================
Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
h <http://cagnazzo.name>ttp://cagnazzo.me
=========================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email