IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Worse than NATed IPv4? [was IPv6 for mobile]

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Sun, 26 December 2010 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE1F28C0F4 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:43:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAdi+ClsyTYh for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E8E28C0E5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67245F80E1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:45:56 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041C5F80FE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:45:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 17081 invoked by uid 1007); 26 Dec 2010 11:45:55 +0100
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:45:55 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <20101226104555.GF3695@Space.Net>
References: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012232117350.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se> <AANLkTimjzid5SWRo46C-6Ry14AqaESingSyFwswV6txw@mail.gmail.com> <5E5572D7-D8BD-4258-83AE-DB8E2DB4E503@free.fr> <AANLkTimmW4Y7JBAgDQs+O5mf2oidWdiZ08BMRY9C4gWo@mail.gmail.com> <453F49D7-3E28-4DB7-ABE6-F843B2DE8F40@free.fr> <AANLkTin44gbk3HE2VSB-id2yznggiCqAcgRRFP7KKq6s@mail.gmail.com> <EFF0E67E-025E-472C-A21A-703E59554CB2@free.fr> <20101225221617.GC3695@Space.Net> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012252345490.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012260809270.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jAJnlX6Iz2QeVWJH"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1012260809270.27193@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: v6ops v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Worse than NATed IPv4? [was IPv6 for mobile]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:43:53 -0000

Hi,

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 08:10:06AM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Dec 2010, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> > Well, actually we have gotten IPv6 to "work" on a huawei stick, but we 
> > had to manually configure the IPv6 address in linux (logged into the 
> > GGSN to find out what address it was supposed to be), as IPV6CP didn't 
> > seem to work on the PPP layer from the usb stick.
> 
> Correction, this wasn't a dongle, it was a symbian phone attached to a 
> computer running linux.

No big surprise here - the Nokia (symbian) phones support IPv6 quite well,
both as a "modem" and for running local apps.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status