Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B021208B9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-Tj0Fo7mmnI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C6B120883 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 05:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id o11so7621373qtr.11 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 05:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=X1hiMhhaaGXUvMuEYN0kcc5ny3WPDx7QTpsVgllkke8=; b=FHNEUj1pjaJmqtuYMI3HajoyDcIwM6H28Qz3Rxi9Wgm7UczSp3RVoLIbilSumGu/Kf 8lIWQcSaWS3ITDyIhmgSdHWe9H/grSnHwZuSBKRJN7K1llxjFh7tMmh18qG7xUA5t0xp EGSVgECtBl0uhUfBiLuDAu3FmnhLGI2Z133EYDgOtreEfglYV2JO4MK9GJUsUWAegmj4 Uy7dg62B7ZnRwj8OIvNz3TpACwv/+I7rX0F5zhkeVMRzE/vrY5XhbICtYBSHcqktITW2 fTvj73mp3dqrJ8qsfXvl935SlhfOmy+Z6pTv7W8KT/HLtujE4zgRKjCJDxqUTEEV8LnW I+JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=X1hiMhhaaGXUvMuEYN0kcc5ny3WPDx7QTpsVgllkke8=; b=eGYWuIMQC5acOnx4u2Rtar8/H60XeQVhQZ/Ay4c+8uM4ilis3YQBCqjpzwWneeEzPt j/Pa6Dp0QVFI26sS91nurQKecn8PNEsgCFrDUqWsQk2mXdrwAhK6lmrOCLE8i3jhb9AF C0sqG6oh0SuP6X7/HM+HfzcKBgIdwuPv8rhylhDSst5M06F2x6BN4D/3z/nbZW3Z2oMk Hb1zkvoeO24anLo692y3KPjCXdrnfuzystmZzlIlr5Kl5uCFUQMvmLGIGI3WtjoXdvDA wBcq+RZ51iKVv+EfGxQ0ms+IEt0pNLx79ronSsFQl3xmFFqc4JBVnuW48/l3HRRhQMBH b0jg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXZLIGnlefyrmlnnHmrCe3seJvA1j60qNLWpx9IeZoQx3nljvwV XBwj66V47OTROGbpq8ZJk5rP5HhJIWTpZg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxm0BiqsgynR4Or+1wpdNRLmvLF3XcwNBP/ZCZkTioItJjQawdjaXSIlr3KwPkttRwRcgCa5w==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2986:: with SMTP id o6mr10169333qtd.320.1572610965997; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:186c:1ff3:ea8d:a057? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:186c:1ff3:ea8d:a057]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w15sm4263067qtk.43.2019.11.01.05.22.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2019 05:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <166A84EB-3F53-43D2-86AD-C1233DA45399@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E00D315A-F18C-4D17-8112-747E2D98CAC0"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 08:22:43 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FAED1B1E-43D1-4C00-8EDE-CBDA01B0EBFE@employees.org>
Cc: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <CAO42Z2yQ_6PT3nQrXGD-mKO1bjsW6V3jZ_2kNGC2x586EMiNZg@mail.gmail.com> <B53CE471-C6E8-4DC1-8A72-C6E23154544F@fugue.com> <325e84aa-1703-e1ce-55a6-8790ceb7aff0@si6networks.com> <4C6471D4-0F5B-49EE-A38A-22AB2B87DA7E@fugue.com> <CE3BC775-8B50-43E6-8145-3CAB60F6AB4E@delong.com> <ED3EB4A2-30AE-4A1F-82C2-38E9D3A47AC1@fugue.com> <FAED1B1E-43D1-4C00-8EDE-CBDA01B0EBFE@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/p-qG4BpfcbUurNLx4Tw7xJ0d-o0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 12:22:53 -0000

On Nov 1, 2019, at 7:17 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> At the risk of straying off topic. There is no mechanism for permissionless networking in IPv6.
> (which I think is a big gap)

Do you mean permissionless advertising of routes to new networks?   If so, I agree.   It can be made to sort of work for limited cases, but there’s no standardized way to make end-to-end connectivity work between all networks using the various bits of protocol and practice that we have at present.