Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A36212D85F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:26:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HIHAJDHoo0_q for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:26:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0130712D859 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id x42so8017639ita.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:26:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wlnaa5s0Nrhlwbva8654YmTOjNQ1dVyGMgbF+06AE2o=; b=lK5YNfwIbKptqg2iARrCQmP5VD51zcboDsx3YjOiRPGEmeiboAk2gXkI3vyVZeZ/TA RJt+HuwUG4mdAzGJj31wJwIC51AwhmS/qAUfQEJo4k+tYs8kZbp84a87PtA1DJTeNICG 7oj2OPVatWwX9PC/mBxzyrzwCfBUdHyJrJRPDzlL4r+oBoLjAbaKkMWbC7BGFu7fNeW6 iC7cLIz6Xs4X044e04Njxu/SKrr2vHEvAh87gjCw7TNyetXCcreugiktxyJC+binioiF s7O/YWsgxC3WfwM1w5TTa54PIv564nMtYNWadoaJBGxdHygMPjRJ6ss/IDPeA0x8ensY rVmw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wlnaa5s0Nrhlwbva8654YmTOjNQ1dVyGMgbF+06AE2o=; b=g4TzNtU7n/tF02M1UolhEoBV8law88/U4XZt3BXXY82QUZW9DF5M+MUOz8ERzLyXjK 0oBbJ1r4pVk418Qw+Nbt8UsVU8bb6n/Ewh66CXKKoJH7CXD0p9zMCc37rJaxG2jVWgqq w0jQV7COq4L788ytuvD4xfOmn8h6QFxr9a9SVnOXnDVLMYt95Q3mfvqhJcwELIruP6wN 4H3u59KyrkfqODKjq4E4hfGmP24yUB8ZF/ro+hqaT78/lPnP/18+27MT2ormoOp5HaSc M75rKmRCXRRyyBlCGRTFoM0P/xw+eu8DBve0IQfsbi1h5sVtVs3f50V1J+AKTOGVKYJD bR3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcaxkSCEvfC9zaNIKTPE4kQ7KRkZZkoGZDHAJXt0Kay+HB4WXJe 1Y2nWL+Btr18qObx5iQ2KKMi8m0UKtr/92tOlvLecA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotkswZR3hHK8ge6XXr9E4pCjALkXABd7o5SwVgWLpmED3Zgq/U7k93PgN2hTZbUYeYu3P0eSLSx2duJyCqDkAg=
X-Received: by 10.36.182.73 with SMTP id d9mr1900774itj.124.1515504382950; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 05:26:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.102.19 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:26:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180109124308.GA45648@Space.Net>
References: <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com> <066901d385ab$64d663b0$2e832b10$@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2GjXKM53rJJwRzX7RyrCG8u+KZ0TTGuFv=NefHsKRxrw@mail.gmail.com> <11d764f6-e0d7-c24e-7b51-c8b5bb026082@gmail.com> <20180109120700.GW45648@Space.Net> <592ac6fa-9d1f-e802-3c29-8d70dedf60b3@gmail.com> <20180109121654.GY45648@Space.Net> <7d0aa9fb-ac74-52dc-0437-01c173f2b38e@gmail.com> <20180109122844.GZ45648@Space.Net> <4cca5ac8-e80a-6297-205e-464f490facb0@gmail.com> <20180109124308.GA45648@Space.Net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:26:02 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1x4ECNBHD+=m2ogCQGtR0+StHEvXGNc6Cioxv2FFTGkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082038f8678c1c056257dc33"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pCBv0IbZ-ai0hU8AtDlr51BKQU8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 13:26:29 -0000

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> > >> Ok, let me rewrite: The Prefix Delegation DHCPv6 is the best way to
> make
> > >> a mobile hotspot.
> > >
> > > No.
> >
> > Err, I do not know what you have in mind when you say 'no', but I do
> > know what I have in mind when I say it is.
>
> "No" means "it is not the best way".


Well... FWIW, RFC 7278 does say that DHCPv6 PD is the best way :-)
<ducks>