[v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 12 September 2020 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512E33A0D60 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiZGY1VwjAgc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D463A0D61 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id w7so9564456pfi.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=k1+t3AHBB+Rpv6CWfVDj97pEU8fyqaIl79M4LBgTitI=; b=dTwuEBAwRwzdqrKueqwgD0xLpKPQpW714ayMpKs/wpNcQ9QoctLHZ9kmmYJW5lavhB Uw+GT+IYJN+sj01UG7ZLTafzEeToXeTufDcjySP+I/TcN/zBOLMKBArBu7pgXAB4MOyf 4C76V1kIPqmzViGJJkoI0MrwqDGpoQoCk8c8RM4uNZaHX+qobs9T9ZzLx5PaOLWXi3Vh /c0tzDbloCQT2ovr6paXvfb2cNbWbXkJJVpDG3Dp4QjFDmE7UY8iM9J+m/cFROIy4NPN 0S4Ch2j7X5wVUruWh4ulMoFWlYohyrLQ54GJIeOfmru5aUVtPJ98dRRypxwMpqiQN4eM 2Dmg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=k1+t3AHBB+Rpv6CWfVDj97pEU8fyqaIl79M4LBgTitI=; b=qEwOcabCDb2cKS0mhMkzHZMBghv8SVYjyj9QlU2542cYNLMk//qjaXLXXLYJjYyv4J /nVy0Y0VeMKDZTIoScixCot+j1WgTCh84xnbN8/LALe5Ysk74xG4LYIDz9NGbBB1WYaZ kihUczNLUQnN2GZnMgiaEWutOc5zWrYGUP21HfHx2xvoIBnM2NDcRDEuLRBH3gtTYMkn j8ESmMwIA+KlSfuUqzwIKvwimuW55L9d1RKLs+doQMhKYJKM+rcDFmkid5O9nJ2pObZL QsjFmsgir5/1D9c7cJHzRhJrIKH7L6forrJNDt5bUI9S7qIna8ahH+ogD5e+xZ5IBVQy L44w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5309qMr35H9za1AGKrLplDizpyoowte6Ujeq8btmIpEuZLNj0zS1 XhHKXGrEVxP4PrZdxn51Hqg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyboGR5kmhYSFa6LUSMpBdN226VbeM3utXDF5Dz9A0IB9udFrEApmJqkSQ4tvejxVYcNaD/Sw==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9592:0:b029:13e:d13d:a054 with SMTP id z18-20020aa795920000b029013ed13da054mr7359284pfj.26.1599940335546; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2607:fb90:30d7:6543:a8e0:c17b:43be:b099]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm5959298pfi.119.2020.09.12.12.52.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.0.3.2.26\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 12:52:13 -0700
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.0.3.2.26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pSe7dntE7DF0aQ96g66EYUV-IrA>
Subject: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 19:52:17 -0000

As is usual with requests for draft discussion in v6ops, we (the chairs) are looking for active supportive discussion of the draft on the v6ops list. I would suggest that you get the operators you are discussing the technology with to discuss their deployment on the list. Also, given that the -00 was posted in 2016, the -11 in 2018, and it has not been updated since, I would strongly suggest that you update the draft with current experience and post a revision - we generally don't consider drafts for the agenda that have not been updated since the last IETF meeting.

Section 4 ("IPv10 Packet Header Format") clearly discusses a protocol. According to the v6ops charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/v6ops/charter/), at most "the v6ops Working Group may provide input to those areas/groups, as needed, and cooperate with those areas/groups in reviewing solutions to IPv6 operational and deployment problems." What working group are you discussing this protocol in?

> On Sep 11, 2020, at 1:56 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi V6OPS WG,
> 
> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Khaled Omar