[v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 14:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0BD1B2E2D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQ4dYnzxk8x1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2010F1B2E2E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1770; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437487332; x=1438696932; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=LbyyhqjGYu8kMGMAP0IKUfM/BNzOQHMTZEb1zTk43a8=; b=dFjT+9gZvVsfWNBh2WRd1F/KE75EioNPKGaeFwbiDhoJNyfSFQV0JCJx 1pR+wtUvVLx9Q84I1bKx3Y+oPEe3kVqkIvm4jdDGjr6bqjPDxAKwli4qA nenSVH79ERYSx/UUM8Aqe4ogigXmrdWfUl0GwOnTHscThSphL5m1pemmg k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AiAwC/T65V/5FdJa1cgxNUb7wKCYF1hz04FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQqgQsBgQAnBAEgiCANyyEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcEk3CBFAWUUwGCNYFXaIc1mQ4mg3yCNoEEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,516,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="170748785"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2015 14:02:11 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6LE2BpH017747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:02:11 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:02:11 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, "lorenzo@google.com" <lorenzo@google.com>
Thread-Topic: Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
Thread-Index: AQHQw73WnPgrOvjAyEyawMXgVWiTmg==
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:02:10 +0000
Message-ID: <6153A91F-7E9A-4579-BA06-72964568D343@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.91.41]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9928B609-9149-4431-A27B-E64C24D7C48F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/pZKod3Ulk8w9Q65KBbypJPvDTRA>
Subject: [v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:02:18 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
  "Considerations For Using Unique Local Addresses", Bing Liu, Sheng
  Jiang, 2015-05-03

This draft came up from the floor this afternoon. I think we need some concentrated constructive conversation regarding it - we have had a lot of the other kind.

What issues do we need to address to complete it. and what specific recommendations would that include?