Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 19 August 2013 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A43C11E814F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0iH1wnjBNlpT for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBE311E814E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JISa3U025916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <521263D3.6070704@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:28:35 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201308181800.r7II06mv003294@irp-view13.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:29:37 -0000

Hi, all,

I don't quite understand a WGLC on an individual submission. IMO, if 
it's a WG doc it needs to be opened up for substantial revision.

As an individual submission, I think it strays too far into the purview 
of this WG to be permitted.

On the specific point of content, the paragraph at the end of the intro 
is disingenuous; Section 2.2 is far too brief to be considered anything 
but dismissive of the cons of dropping fragments, and the rest of the 
document reads like justification of that behavior.

Joe

On 8/18/2013 11:00 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop.  Please read it now. If you find nits
> (spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the
> authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a
> statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed,
> please post your comments to the list.
>
> We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
> document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
> believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
> comment to make.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>