[v6ops] Re: v6ops Digest, Vol 168, Issue 29

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Fri, 09 August 2024 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC6FC14F702 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxtMkUL9Bb_g for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 661C6C14F705 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2024 07:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-70d316f0060so2112671b3a.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:07:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; t=1723212460; x=1723817260; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Wv64OdWAUjWRxtVF8PtcXvWth+6ioR9kIec/5TiI2lU=; b=rKzl11QKKCFiYlxe2Laudjyn8VgI5xKiokhZF0y40QWp+4UHFF80T3XAwUJOoGm5ay 6lvujWdODfcRkPT6tbGP5QfBEik82vB5eCyJP7MFXLoDd7rKOa0OPChXKNu2p6qOtpoM HWe4C+1NoZ9UYun4IwWz10wptEsw6HVkvvDWM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723212460; x=1723817260; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Wv64OdWAUjWRxtVF8PtcXvWth+6ioR9kIec/5TiI2lU=; b=kxvv+yejDGXuy82xSnOaQM50K+yJOpTYa+dmEiR5uVmf6huIlzbk2CLh3zcHyqfoqe X9tNNcgxO72xgEBTo2eMq7C/yq8RUlnp3b9gRuGHEX1InxzJi95BLC2li0saUzlz/BVP OL4NUqORJxBPKDvnTR3pHgaVqyU2TLinhwZrapbL9sQTGk8B03kCKFV44LmSwNbDlMOp Z+9u4whtCs/jMIF5SDkStjg2qjaMU4pYHs9Xaag0hPC3xEipofmzge/1HXxYcX6ZGQG5 2aulvrSDsFrYLoTWx44TzDkE3LYi4hsCFvUoGEZTRI7jDJCxZE9Cx9ExudQ36QqgqPPk gJHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+GyZL0I+7fHjiLi+CuB+svSlEIFch9ks3fJAOe6UUQ0LKfOMg 5QadiVhrx5GMDq/7MkjyxV2WswBonKJMI+OJh1tWAzT10s/uGvlUpZXmMfoPPZjL+0prSthy/Uf WR/djZqpKdzI8mX3quCO9rHDkmCUP1gMSM3onvA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG8BTEECtfB/kYTYWIj4zeG/HKlSd7PiqHS6ovAMgltFwEGN5+BlUX5/w6K3xzIFx3mbx/spWldsSDybo06AV0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:da88:b0:1fb:2ebc:d17a with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-200ae5db0d8mr26804195ad.23.1723212459706; Fri, 09 Aug 2024 07:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <df01e0f8-1b0d-4792-be2c-89a59da7de49.ref@swbell.net> <df01e0f8-1b0d-4792-be2c-89a59da7de49@swbell.net> <CAJgLMKte1H3FaoQOhc7_No=SNdczQFo2_mp2c1FvTOqLCRFm2g@mail.gmail.com> <6e70bed7-6f84-4a4a-90f8-fec1d10a599b@swbell.net>
In-Reply-To: <6e70bed7-6f84-4a4a-90f8-fec1d10a599b@swbell.net>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 10:07:28 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKsXHcxzu8Kbrg1pu9SDkGDH0b1bWzW__CrfpDaSv3Joog@mail.gmail.com>
To: The Multach's <jmultach@swbell.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000088b18d061f40aa18"
Message-ID-Hash: 36UWZWAYVVF5AOKAKLYGGPKUOTHDD6P7
X-Message-ID-Hash: 36UWZWAYVVF5AOKAKLYGGPKUOTHDD6P7
X-MailFrom: tim@qacafe.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: v6ops Digest, Vol 168, Issue 29
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/q0TXGFmSO23ODZZkvXVz05heu58>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Yes.  I've seen several instances of /64 being used for container networks
on CPEs.

~Tim

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 9:38 AM The Multach's <jmultach@swbell.net> wrote:

> So are these considered a LAN link prefix assignment under 7084 L2:
>
> - Assignment of a /64 prefix for internal IPv6 communication between a
> primary SoC and a secondary chip (e.g., a Wi-Fi chip which uses IPv6).
>
> - Assignment of a /64 prefix for usage by an internal container or VM.
>
>
> On 8/9/2024 7:56 AM, Timothy Winters wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:58 PM The Multach's <jmultach@swbell.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >     The following, while being user focused, fails to take into
> >     account that
> >     some of those prefixes may be used internally (or reserved for
> >     internal
> >     use) by the CPE or for ISP purposes and not assignable:
> >
> >     "SHOULD" (or an elongated exception for the above) would be more
> >     appropriate.
> >
> >     LPD-4: After LAN link prefix assignment the IPv6 CE Router MUST
> >     make the
> >     remaining IPv6 prefixes available to other routers via Prefix
> >     Delegation.
> >
> > I think this covers that case.   After local assignment, unused
> > prefixes MUST be made available.
> > LPD-2:  The IPv6 CE Router MUST assign a prefix from the delegated
> >            prefix as specified by L-2 [RFC7084].
> >
> > 7084
> >    L-2:   The IPv6 CE router MUST assign a separate /64 from its
> >           delegated prefix(es) (and ULA prefix if configured to provide
> >           ULA addressing) for each of its LAN interfaces.
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     v6ops mailing list -- v6ops@ietf.org
> >     To unsubscribe send an email to v6ops-leave@ietf.org
> >
>