IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt

Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz> Mon, 19 November 2012 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1555421F8667 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:09:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.710, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HpiDCGsjQllM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub1.t-mobile.cz (mailhub1.t-mobile.cz [62.141.0.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596D521F84FC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:09:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srvhk504.rdm.cz (unknown [10.254.92.81]) by mailhub1.t-mobile.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E6828580E; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:09:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SRVHKE02.rdm.cz ([fe80::94ce:8456:f6fa:86a8]) by srvhk504.rdm.cz ([fe80::506:b9a6:d353:9494%12]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:09:34 +0100
From: Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:06:05 +0100
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt
Thread-Index: Ac3GMYcG5QbjvUfKRYGciVvK2UxAgQAbqfmg
Message-ID: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC6CF6EA655@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz>
References: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E947B1328@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <CAKD1Yr0PcobuWwu+Dp36NHaFRyinD1SRV0WPk792h9EwwsuFmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0PcobuWwu+Dp36NHaFRyinD1SRV0WPk792h9EwwsuFmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC6CF6EA655SRVHKE02rdmcz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forwarded
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:09:37 -0000

From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lorenzo Colitti
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:39 AM
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-binet-v6ops-cellular-host-requirements-00.txt

I do not think this document is ready for WG adoption.

Can we agree on that such a document is required?


REQ#27: Why support DHCPv6 PD if no mobile networks will support it for a number of years?

[ales] I am expecting PD being supported in ~2 years timeframe, so it is definitely worth considering.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email