Re: [v6ops] 464xlat case study (was reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 28 September 2017 08:53 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59D0134657 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qaBrslfphiZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DAF134654 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 01:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5F69AB1; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:53:42 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1506588822; bh=iPtLJYGvHVrRX+Yb1yNsjBz/XXbQbGIpJuX1sOPiCxA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Jo3+3FZyVXkBQuSChHXd+4w+pvDe5SDpbtaTYnNJCjXA6IozA3U9zA1lZHU0LFQn+ kvZ5mF6yjeZVWTUbmjw00+J92LoYoQw7UMabvoApzO4aZGaoCJpcvWuje1iCLT4vse YUeYfSJpR5ZpQ/ue0cRLrlSdZyeOcmu9PZKQ9lcI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E8FAF; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:53:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:53:42 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxqRar=X6c6WJNOWtKA3S6Dx8nXcuwYYh8OyK3oncJYnsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709281052430.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <LO1P123MB01168388285206BB7C26F029EA7A0@LO1P123MB0116.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <46045DAA-9096-43BA-A5FD-571232767726@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3vziaHfkR+hQ7QHXaz7QraKH2HLUVXUW63GpnOAj4JoQ@mail.gmail.com> <E72C3FBE-57A4-4058-B9E5-F7392C9E9101@google.com> <LO1P123MB0116805F9A18932E2D0694FEEA780@LO1P123MB0116.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <1496304E-54BE-47FA-A7F1-1AA6E163DAB1@employees.org> <CAD6AjGQdMFgv4727wHm41HmEyo2Z-PCabPHPSRSVwOi_rey7OQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr03zsuSBqPegs6RNbBqnJizUOLZwH+rNDi1Ocg4k+mARQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170928030630.DD2D08867238@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709280753080.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20170928074105.BCB99886E538@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709280955490.18564@uplift.swm.pp.se> <20170928081527.21D9F886EF0C@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAAedzxqRar=X6c6WJNOWtKA3S6Dx8nXcuwYYh8OyK3oncJYnsQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/qHhEhC_ppTDDIhmO7DcEWTDFHDM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464xlat case study (was reclassify 464XLAT as standard instead of info)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:53:46 -0000

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, Erik Kline wrote:

> I can just feel all the "android and dhcpv6" screeds being written right 
> now...

Do any other mobile operating systems do DHCPv6 on the GTP tunnel? It's 
been too many years since I last looked at GTP packet traces to remember 
if this was done or not.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se