IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C43C21F8618 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:30:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.345, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6da7p-ngxcI5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:30:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC69921F8617 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:30:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_bhyrh5p+ngWa8DHJZNmARQ)"
Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0LYU00IRL6EWF8M1@mail-out.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807137-b7b87ae000004a2b-53-4f2c5210aea7
Received: from kallisti.apple.com (kallisti.apple.com [17.193.13.64]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 00.09.18987.0125C2F4; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:30:56 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:30:56 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-id: <33E9F5E8-FE9C-4863-B4B7-AD7CB50F598E@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieJDXQVcgSMff4NMDS4vTx/YyOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoEro+vhJ8aCD3oVZx5/Ym9gvKjRxcjJISFgIrHsxUsmCFtM4sK9 9WxdjFwcQgKzmSQm9b5nA0mwCahIfLt8F6yIV8BQYuardlYQm1kgQWLXze3MILYw0KBHu7aA 1bMA1a87uhCohoODUyBQYnc/2C4RAQWJHf93go0REgiQmHfxLDNICa+AjcSkB8IQJ8hK3D64 n2kCI+8sJMtmIVkGYWtLLFv4GsjmALJ1JCYvZEQVhrA/nj/CtICRbRWjYFFqTmKloZleYkFB Tqpecn7uJkZQ0DUUmu9g3P5X7hCjAAejEg8vo5aOvxBrYllxZe4hRgkOZiURXit1oBBvSmJl VWpRfnxRaU5q8SFGaQ4WJXHebdbK/kIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTBZJg5OqQbGLYKta+4cFzm1Y2eD 7rIb25apq5RU6VWa1ac+U56yYuru+lPG5bF3N5WauZ5SaPf4OTXv8r5s1u6k9pUPGD4eut6R uTsjN7bEwO6JgDU/X6fdI90nLxZX8jxs3PHzyKzTWcoTmx1WBfgWZp6TO7p7e0lr/z+uvZ0X Umo0DRk0y8w4wphytsgosRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAmYCIBjYCAAA=
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:30:58 -0000

On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:17 , Cameron Byrne wrote:
>  Right now, some networks feel they are held back by "IPv6 spoilers" like Skype that require IPv4. [...]

Who knew networks could be so touchy-feely and civilized?  Me, I'm more of a barbarian.

"Conan, what is best in life?"
"To break obsolete IPv4-only applications, to see the revenues of their developers crushed, and to hear the lamentations of their abandoned users."
"Ah, yes... that is best."

But no, I don't think this should be a working group draft.  It might be worthy of publication by the individual track, but it would be a waste of valuable WG agenda slots.

> Please also comment to the folks at Android that this code should be brought into the Android main line distribution

Yes.  Please please please add 464XLAT to the Android main line distribution.  I will shout with joy if they do that.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email