Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Fri, 02 November 2012 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F03D21F884B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1+fOI-QMe3YF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFD721F8835 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.94] (pool-71-105-94-82.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.105.94.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA2DnLfq022269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 06:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5093CF61.9090301@isi.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:49:21 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr13cNspdWvTaXxHt4R_8UB-CKeA4nq8_XWrkbFGCgW7Gg@mail.gmail.com> <5090DECF.3050100@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1dUy-f78A2+kfA7NjpzD0WQRT8iwqGYAm5A=Erodpn-A@mail.gmail.com> <20121031.122110.41655699.sthaug@nethelp.no> <50910E41.2030100@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0mTTcVeq+Qf0fLv3UCBP_90QmStkK3Ha4tDdm3FxJjVA@mail.gmail.com> <50915F86.7050304@gmail.com> <509165B8.404@si6networks.com> <509169C2.9040208@isi.edu> <50916F21.6030303@si6networks.com> <509174F1.8080809@isi.edu> <50924264.7040300@gmail.com> <5092C0BA.4090000@isi.edu> <5092C846.5090009@gmail.com> <5092D5B1.2000201@isi.edu> <509381B3.9040602@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <509381B3.9040602@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:50:33 -0000

Hi, Brian,

On 11/2/2012 1:17 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
...
>> Isn't the real bug the fact that the option numbers don't indicate
>> whether an option is HBH or not?
>
> Why is that a problem? The extension header that contains the options
> tells you that (0 for hbh options, 60 for destination options).

Except for extension headers that are yet to be defined.

I.e., while you're fixing the order, another key issue is that:

	all HBH options MUST occur only in the HBH extension header

(similarly, 60 isn't strictly the only destination header; see esp. the 
end of Sec. 4.6, but that is much less problematic)

Frankly, the HBH extension header is misnamed; AFAICT, this is intended 
to be the true forwarding plane options. Other other currently defined 
options (AFAICT), including the routing option, occur only when the 
router is really acting as a host (i.e., where that router owns the 
destination IP address of the packet).

Joe