IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] RFC7934

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FED6131C1E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Je09B-1jkjt0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1722A12ECF0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 5so26109894iow.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XaamiIW7chfqKOxbfDmMM18mssxrmEp6MzgGv+vt5e0=; b=gLxiEo8iykhOnVggpCNAb21+QWZpuR6kCWKNP6Gom2tt6zslwkCYnl7r3QauYuX11M o2DsB1uJE/DPqlas+hBI9AS6EGbw8fU6mzXnMhtDyhlAuWY9dQ0GwVU8UHXqtm1sUZpM tPz/KRVzjr6RW37H2QqUtMA6gYmulsSFDJDvmiEOPsAmOb7/dJikexV+sCGEUT0Fs1jv ioa6D3UUMdwLlPA2/XpIM0egBwX4gHgaFtNu4zxOG419yMwE+eoxB3KNqabdHgs0UDZR mZY1v2O38ia8g5Vxg3FEldD63X0a/Wc5w9N59fQv+omO5Ce4EgDbKOhUlPt+buSoNuB8 +FTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XaamiIW7chfqKOxbfDmMM18mssxrmEp6MzgGv+vt5e0=; b=pL4uTX8FMxE1z9XeNchgxxJSkh3Ugh/iTp6dI6ka1YSFFljAdDClzRhwhNCnLGZMaV aL14Uw/jH8r/OduFerU2z88AkZOA/+STamLhwyf1Eu7sEqwuMWAxRL/HgmTw2epWIge5 lFoivb5yTn+2C4Tzf1x27522nNcrJeWTzXDvU75O5wuO8Wf3NPBMCD89iSXcefXV7ySv WLTL7SqrnlGpMJgauYcXka7FtY1FdoIH7uJ0d+J9OR6mU+U6Uujm8YmTvzoY1J0JvxRJ Y/O+SWDrVkXNHJhkcflKRSsGtDEKvW7GnPp+UhxCqqHF7DZObjksTPebLajg8WRaSXIQ XCJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113ZuG8lPpWiHbEGnsW9tw62AAE3REswWGs7pBXVnYzTmsi4sdFi nOPFIQGfYHrkEoGk9EWkWtRGRx9ddg==
X-Received: by 10.107.197.4 with SMTP id v4mr1264919iof.124.1500452812423; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.55.215 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 01:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29e1e447-2dca-028f-87dc-6fab52ee4f00@gmail.com>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <CAFU7BAQ5h5dHKmDbOHo9+JCgo+WZpQmctf8F+_0OfJ0dV=tmww@mail.gmail.com> <ef9cc89d-8fbc-47c1-6955-0c005149b13c@gmail.com> <CAFU7BASSdp5+0DQr+7vusZ14YW3Zcu9se4x7zpt02-tNvVS_DQ@mail.gmail.com> <29e1e447-2dca-028f-87dc-6fab52ee4f00@gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 18:26:31 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQqXoZimBiZCKkDoiAS9sAY0g2E5oh2hdjBHZJ0GgvxVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/qmDVWOqbqVg3-wOgJx447XF99Oo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7934
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:26:54 -0000

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Alexandre Petrescu
<alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let me give you an example. Imagine that we have apples and oranges.
>> Then I say: 'It is recommended that children are given apples every
>> day'. Does it mean "giving children oranges is not recommended'? No.
>> False. However the statement 'giving children oranges (and oranges
>> ONLY) is not recommended' is true. See the difference? ;)
>
>
> Give children 3 apples and oranges a day.

Is it a question or a statement? ;) Obviously, the statement 'It is
recommended that children are given apples every day' does not
prohibit giving children 3 apples and oranges (neither it makes it
'not recommended').
(Please note that we are discussing the example above and this example
ONLY, no conclusions about recommended number of IPv6 addresses on
hosts can be made from the statement that it's OK to give children 3
apples'.

However....Let's look at this example...
If the Kids Nutrition Working Group agreed that ''It is recommended
that children are given apples every day', then:
- 'Give children 3 apples and oranges a day' is allowed and does not
conflict with the recommendation.
If the WG also agreed that 'it is NOT RECOMMENDED to impose a hard
limit on how many apples children are allowed to have', then:
- "Give children 3 apples and oranges a day." statement violates the
recommendation if '3' is a hard limit and children are not allowed 4
apples.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email