Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 24 January 2018 19:55 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBDC12700F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:55:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qG384Bkydtqd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3549D12751F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 11:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w0OJsvwC043899; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:54:57 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 17B9820539B; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:54:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01017201A89; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:54:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.225] ([132.166.84.225]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w0OJsuJh017727; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:54:56 +0100
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <D687BC24.92CC1%lee@asgard.org> <A6995969-0C03-4261-92F4-331206825130@gmail.com> <D29099E6-510D-41DA-B998-6BF15E9FDE7F@gmail.com> <D68B9BCE.96312%lee@asgard.org> <A5D8E026-ADB1-487C-AC20-30CA478A7B89@employees.org> <D68BA9E1.96407%lee@asgard.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801231001340.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <D68CD7C8.966A0%lee@asgard.org> <913e9068-83f4-3af6-7d0c-2b06ddb07fb0@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bf082e4f-18d6-fed2-9216-610e4dee3946@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:54:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <913e9068-83f4-3af6-7d0c-2b06ddb07fb0@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/qzJijkNepda2lf2Y3jqMz9Z2Q0c>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:55:01 -0000


Le 24/01/2018 à 14:29, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
[...]

I said:
> Cellular operator does have answers about why they continue using IPv4 
> to transport IPv6 (instead of using IPv6 to transport IPv6.)

FYI, over in the 5gangip email list at IETF I am told to stop making 
such statements, and proposed counter-examples that I have no means to 
verify other than asking for packet dumps.

Until then I still believe it is worth writing an Internet Draft about 
GTP on IPv4 and on IPv6.  Such thing does not exist and I dont like that.

Alex