IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Sun, 16 February 2014 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCCA1A027A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:57:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogTx_1yPZQvZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:57:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F1E1A0277 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:57:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delong-dhcp227.delong.com (delong-dhcp27 [192.159.10.227]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s1GJrZQn001247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:53:36 -0800
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 owen.delong.com s1GJrZQn001247
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1392580416; bh=j+eJ0+CP0WWENFImdqDwjncTCqs=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=Zj48YhhAonUr6ed+sk4uia8+aJt17gj8ceR+WKpjKVx2Rgg2hagAas3Gu6z0Rh2Rg ElctH+qeqS40baFhTFzoKEsaMvtgqk4/+VssKWWo+9WgCmJvilMOZHdA3dvGHH/AoQ KApQyLlWkK4obhLxlApU8l0LzBlhU7GaxJ0HT8jE=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:53:15 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D587623B-3F85-4BD4-B697-B84390F2A202@delong.com>
References: <20140214091302.13219.20624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m21tz6javn.wl%randy@psg.com> <1442fd6c81e.5859224653900445752.5189762259388794287@internetdraft.org> <52FEBE28.1010006@gmail.com> <8E2A8B56-6F05-4F09-BE7E-651B9CA42458@delong.com> <5300CE32.1050808@gmail.com> <BD473E46-E382-44E6-B474-A56D074318FA@delong.com> <530104B3.3070205@gmail.com> <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0rc1 (owen.delong.com [192.159.10.2]); Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rFLAlqpzOTo7cIJi8UfA_aU8fwk
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:57:44 -0000

On Feb 16, 2014, at 11:16 , Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> Le 15/02/2014 19:16, Owen DeLong a écrit :
>>>>> Indeed, the situations where ULA usage is detrimental vastly
>>>>> outnumbers those where it is actually beneficial.
> 
> That's an opinion, but it isn't an argument for abolishing
> ULAs. It's actually an argument for improving this draft so
> that it describes the cases in which ULAs are beneficial.
> Could we have a detailed conversation about whether those cases
> are correctly described in the draft?
> 
>    Brian

I was arguing for an improvement to the draft, not for the abolishment of ULA.

While I would not be sad to see ULA deprecated, that's not a topic of this discussion or even this WG.

Owen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email