Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sat, 23 February 2019 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184AF130DFA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WeY9JYGbbQAt for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F40C12008F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id m9so3110932qkl.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=MDC2sueDvJr9x+LgbMguma8ziUPrAxwG4d16aMPSaYE=; b=cIRuaIAkQ7zuBaSolYY4M7/jyQefZZsMPR/su5CoXp/+S8BWzLDh8lGkGKckAl+Jzk Ll0HqwBVjb1Hpk2rgDJDw0rtl16DQT9MPf+8KdhXpEwSRfW44P992B8KYWyvsfWRVd7Z 8Z/Rg34IHLNTBy5KR+qZaq2bZOQv/bwZ8YlDedb6KdG6OwjdxZ7wsNVz8Rglqajx4zEF g4+EjB4oXOYB+dJEo4xZ5wibYQXmGlTokklJUHuSQORbEC2wg9yv3U9Has9fmbplpoCL 1nDjn6o+hCZ7UGOxaqg66bYSYDUnaTFRZrOUiO9AgU/cnh0dY0ox7zeTLPwoTubVNEim xOaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=MDC2sueDvJr9x+LgbMguma8ziUPrAxwG4d16aMPSaYE=; b=lnn3rfDSA//6gzsbauNfJn/4vSLSihrspFf5TbElQ3kW5c1fC/uG/aF6fY2h2ursgH Yhstblq8MXvdUKuSHrHJd+NCOaIxQpcrcA4vu/TqFFeL0luK5G9BJILs3YzI0dy3PlOF qYgUZWqJO3do2PI2fNdAqbyeGsqJFR0SC6cGxUr6POoMZ1Y3mSvnwBvkCftQ8H0+uz54 B9C+oEVNe6eUOMeoEN8tPABhXruOX7Z7rftfQ/7ITPykEEw2qb2aDT0ir1dYQq4kdatT C7Lxz48UKQDUfGZZv7R3NclspR9aL9C5d1O8pDn3BtcSUzlD/OpbwroZWEz58XoRMcT8 yOmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaTAceVQ4mPFLTEMIC0VS7L4enfxEDgIDERIgDatq6cjvrYzuBP bzXDq9ZCbIZqIdOksAnK8s0x3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZjhQvOEsdqmnSl1sw4SQcKUEVTmJeCYqabTuwKzytOPpOiWSfgvpH6qvUMYFmJAOiSycW+pA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:d492:: with SMTP id s18mr7101104qks.343.1550948851192; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.100.12] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j66sm5457236qkj.27.2019.02.23.11.07.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:07:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <F5A08B06-FC10-4435-9839-24015B28EB3F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_108F1B23-24F6-4CDB-A587-7915E753445F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.2\))
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 14:07:29 -0500
In-Reply-To: <7aad94ae-4adb-349c-e2d4-7fb2485f649d@si6networks.com>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <6D78F4B2-A30D-4562-AC21-E4D3DE019D90@consulintel.es> <B6E2EC33-EEAF-40D0-AFCC-BDAFA9134ACD@consulintel.es> <20190220113603.GK71606@Space.Net> <28fbc2c305c640c9afb3704050f6e8d7@boeing.com> <20190220213107.GS71606@Space.Net> <019c552eb1624d348641d6930829fd1f@boeing.com> <CAKD1Yr0HBG+rhyFWg9zh0t3mW486Mjx9umjn+CRqAZg4z9r0dg@mail.gmail.com> <20190221073530.GT71606@Space.Net> <CAO42Z2wmB2W52b4MZ2h9sW5E9cQKm-HRjyf--q8C26jezS7LXQ@mail.gmail.com> <a73818d31db7422b99a524bc431b00ed@boeing.com> <CAO42Z2z9-48Gbb_Exf+oWUqDO=axSLpZBtqeDcxkAoFq5OziGw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S3624hnGauG1HaSWPMvQw0t2Q5R3gb8W4R8w3kuK7dcrWQ@mail.gmail.com> <1F07F2BB-2F37-4D12-9731-7892DF4E3D88@consulintel.es> <0a582916-af14-bd82-a4cd-002a36f8830b@huitema.net> <67515a73-26a5-3ed0-da88-1a4ce64550d3@foobar.org> <A1B1BECB-3A64-437D-8D63-676B24F2340A@huitema.net> <564ca34e-981a-ff92-3318-aaeb46b31dac@gont.com.ar> <CAPt1N1=qHAws1wQ1ONK046BqgbTaNE7MPYm4nr0BWNknV9Yt9Q@mail.gmail.com> <7aad94ae-4adb-349c-e2d4-7fb2485f649d@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rIX5WYmfZKtJXTM1gCRA1EhjYoA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:07:36 -0000

On Feb 23, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> It is extremely likely that I will be requesting agenda myself for 6man.
> 
> If the v6ops chairs think it makes sense to do/present something in
> v6ops, I'd be happy too.

Great, thanks!