IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 08 November 2015 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A010E1B47C0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 14:40:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Q6hNIQPkt3N for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 14:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E451B47BF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 14:40:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1537; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447022405; x=1448232005; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=xuMBfieB5u7Ao9J4Ld8yZyZwd321suAkox3hDWzxpWk=; b=Ni5CXjuPPwLefyj4snOIhPaAAOC3JEbESnu0ZFc2talIGaVyrW7JubR3 0DSdoJ6PnLDZA80UcTa5feYmM4Bx46q78wzylmSRF3/YBxr6q85E1vXHx FYmiU7IXQH6wUCho0Iz7Dc3dTAK5vVbhXwuVpP0uMdpIA/wKy/SWW+Wr7 o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D7AgChzj9W/4MNJK1egzuBQga+Jg6BYYYQAoEfOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENQEBAQMBeQULAgEIGC4hESUCBA4FDogLAwoIuxkNhD8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPCYhkgm6CU4VRgRUFlkgBglKBYYZ+gXWUcodSAR8BQ4QEcgGEXoEHAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,264,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="44960511"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2015 22:40:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tA8Me4vv013644 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 22:40:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 17:40:03 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 17:40:03 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
Thread-Index: AQHRGnZoSpZHjP8ErUqjm3XUkbMcpA==
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:40:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CA8B4AC3-AB12-44A5-97F2-105A97BB6974@cisco.com>
References: <D25D5920.C914E%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <5637FDD0.70300@jvknet.com> <D25E32F1.C9507%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <CAKD1Yr1VvzkSmJo3hu6t_3CUguLN_UkNZjRUqvU_ygPBTyb+8g@mail.gmail.com> <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F45C2319739@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAKD1Yr3g-ZV+MkbtDrusbtYaZ_wmCxDG9XbT25Ldma4koGpV6A@mail.gmail.com> <563909FE.9080404@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <563909FE.9080404@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.70.234.161]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9E73326F-D9CD-4586-8412-E77BBD43BF2B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rSyUMASGArCmqdjfF_rczLeKfjk>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 22:40:06 -0000

> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:24 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think a careful explanation of the failure modes is more useful than a
> bunch of SHOULD NOTs.

Agreed

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email