[v6ops] Update on SLAAC renum I-Ds
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 01 November 2019 13:41 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFF9120850 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKGsZjtRhbz6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347451200CE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 06:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.36] (unknown [177.27.208.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5C9D868BE; Fri, 1 Nov 2019 14:41:49 +0100 (CET)
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <0ede0670-b815-6605-ec51-ee1b1cb3da1c@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 10:40:55 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rvRuQ-ZztdLf-YVMG9gfEYI4kMw>
Subject: [v6ops] Update on SLAAC renum I-Ds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:41:57 -0000
Folks,
Based on the recent/ongoing discussion, I've done the following:
* I have split all the CPE improvements into a stand-alone. So we now
have the following I-Ds:
+ draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum:
Problem statement and operational mitigations
+ draft-gont-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum:
Improvements to Customer Edge Routers.
+ draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum:
Protocol update proposals (working on it right now)
I believe the problem becomes more tractable/actionable this way, since
we can agree, separately, on the problem statement, possible CPE
improvements, and possible protocol updates/improvements.
Some specific comments:
+ draft-gont-v6ops-slaac-renum:
This version suggests a much longer VL, as suggested by Owen. And it
also clarifies that the home network/cpe case is *one* of the
possible flash-renumbering scenarios.
+ draft-gont-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum:
I still need to address some of the feedback received from Owen and
Ted. Namely, evaluate to send A=0,L=0, instead of advertising 0
lifetimes, and go through other possible improvements for the CPE
side.
While there's certainly work to be done in these documents, I believe we
are at a point where the group could make a decision on whether to
pursue this effort.
P.S.: Your feedback on the I-Ds will be welcome!
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [v6ops] Update on SLAAC renum I-Ds Fernando Gont