IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> Fri, 18 September 2020 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D97A3A0C94 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:22:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vsP67C2hVNVG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FE93A0C93 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml730-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D1A482EBC3AFDC8DACB1; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:21:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from msceml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.145) by lhreml730-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:21:30 +0100
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.161) by msceml706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.219.141.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:21:29 +0300
Received: from msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) by msceml703-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.219.141.161]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:21:29 +0300
From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
To: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
CC: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
Thread-Index: AdaLlIyewLCjExjqRk+nNQVH29wmCwAzUPGAABOUmgAAGqqFAAAbuXfAAAxRMoAADNTJAA==
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:21:29 +0000
Message-ID: <2e11a0315196499c81b72c171e014650@huawei.com>
References: <8f964b8650cd4b619ff47aed5b07bc67@huawei.com> <7ef6cbcc-164f-383c-658b-b3c0df859535@go6.si> <1af87e24-1410-8f89-b50d-9c61694e4644@foobar.org> <f97b7ac2-0b36-2fae-58fd-eddee6f8b408@gmail.com> <76f10fa7030044c4a0b71443fde92f24@huawei.com> <CAHL_VyC7u7bNJD9pUzbFTrBtifbCVmQtPn4YHHs5g7T6omKwLQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHL_VyC7u7bNJD9pUzbFTrBtifbCVmQtPn4YHHs5g7T6omKwLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.201.149]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2e11a0315196499c81b72c171e014650huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/s2EXXSaCtz_ZcES2HRAplnSITCc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:22:06 -0000

Some traffic could be local inside the apartment (TV from Server/NAS),
But definitely bigger proportion of traffic is going from real Internet.
It is additional burden to have ULA for local and GUA for wild Internet.
I do not see ULA usefulness without NAT.

From: Richard Patterson [mailto:richard@helix.net.nz]
Sent: 18 сентября 2020 г. 18:55
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 08:05, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com<mailto:vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Brian,
> SLAAC is only one of the victims of flash renumbering. (If there was more
> widespread use of ULAs that might not be true.)
[Ed: ] But How? Subscriber needs access to Global Internet.
Is it possible to connect Google by ULA?

Well if ULAs were used more often for local connectivity, they wouldn't be impacted by an outage of the WAN interface causing the GUA prefix to change.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email