Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 09 October 2014 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B18C1ACDB3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.287
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3SW4GHweeOe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900EC1ACDE9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 04:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3561; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1412855323; x=1414064923; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=EG46Ta8l60EiqGlgZRGhosnwz05euivxFDNsRC8p+wE=; b=Y+MBQdHAvQWqDmTxO+4xhD+0qk/TqkGnleuW8pW+7JycE1Fblis6LV/o /1EvJ3yIvR1b/9HS1PgfmqN6ZSEVzdaZTXjG5f0Pcw4MYO/3z1CQStxTw jMlF50gqyOhCx69hkqXISzahwqvjopCZCwdvr9rzUhYvMfSGU8JYJDvOj w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AikFANN0NlStJA2G/2dsb2JhbABfgw5TWASDAsgKDIdLAoEJFgF7hAMBAQEDAQEBAR4BTAsFCwIBCBgpAwInCyUCBA4FDogoCA2UHZxIAZRVAReQRAeCdDmBHgWGLYtMggyBT2eHEIFqlCeDY2yBSIECAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,684,1406592000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="85405728"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2014 11:48:42 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s99Bmg0j010181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:48:42 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.15]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 06:48:42 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
Thread-Index: AQHP47b4rWr63+YQEk+vrd0E4JUuYA==
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: <FFDC0FDA-2E2C-4046-AFD5-2D15A063124D@cisco.com>
References: <DDCFDE78-07A2-4C0D-B1BD-88456513826C@cisco.com> <54364189.5080905@inetcore.com>
In-Reply-To: <54364189.5080905@inetcore.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21A3EDE8-EBE5-4669-A31B-D009ECEC69F3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sC7H8qcULBlYluSrbcHRRjrjhcw
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 11:48:45 -0000
I would be interested in working group opinions on this note. Is it useful to the operators? On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com> wrote: > Dear chairs, > > Hi, > I submitted "draft-jpcert-ipv6vullnerability-check-00" today. > If v6ops gives a 3 to 5 minutes for me, I would like to talk about this. > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jpcert-ipv6vullnerability-check/ > > Regards, > > P.S. I am still working on this.... until the deadline comes... > > On 2014/10/07 9:09, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >> As I mentioned last week, Lee and I are pulling together an agenda for IETF 91. The drop-dead date for new or updated drafts is 27 October, and frankly it will work better if drafts arrive earlier - as we are looking for working group commentary on them. >> >> Current state of play: >> >> IESG: >> Jul 31 draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 >> Sep 1 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis >> >> IETF Last Call: >> Sep 26 draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile >> >> Working Group Document updated since IETF: >> Sep 18 draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices >> >> Individual Submission updated since IETF: >> Aug 24 draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem >> On list, Ray Hunter suggests someone write "a draft summarizing the ICMP PTB problem" >> Sep 10 draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-in-real-world >> There has been some discussion on-list. >> Sep 15 draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat >> No list commentary >> Sep 18 draft-elkins-v6ops-multicast-virtual-nodes >> Some commentary, not supportive >> Sep 18 draft-wang-v6ops-xlat-prefix-discovery >> A fair amount of discussion, mostly anti-NAT. >> Sep 25 draft-ybai-v6ops-ipv6-for-openstack >> no list commentary >> Oct 5 draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc >> Some list commentary >> >> Working Group Document NOT updated since IETF: >> Jun 18 draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem >> Jul 4 draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations >> >> Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF: >> Apr 7 draft-smith-v6ops-mitigate-rtr-dos-mld-slctd-node >> Jul 3 draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes >> Jul 4 draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi >> Jul 4 draft-yourtchenko-chown-rupik-v6ops-dad-3x >> Jul 20 draft-wang-v6ops-flow-label-refelction >> Jul 21 draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance >> >> more data at http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?sort=status&activedrafts=on&name=v6ops >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >> > > > -- > --------------- > Ruri Hiromi > INTEC Inc.
- [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Ruri Hiromi
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Ruri Hiromi
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda 神明達哉
- Re: [v6ops] Preparing IETF 91 agenda Fernando Gont