IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-04

朱彥如 <yjchui@cht.com.tw> Wed, 06 May 2020 03:16 UTC

Return-Path: <yjchui@cht.com.tw>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A33E3A0D17 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cht.com.tw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fEJLmDdySa7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scan15.cht.com.tw (scan15.cht.com.tw [202.39.160.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A0D3A0D16 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2020 20:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=cht.com.tw; s=bill; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@cht.com.tw; t=1588735011; x=1591327011; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fWYtEiZgwwf7nKocxpp02yNr0qCeSVfjZfE9KDo2tj8=; b=laB5qAib3/+F6SvTgIX21Z90DS5FTYpSkST2YT9Lu+VyhAnrjnopy+vrXQPS5Zpf UT4COsszw0eT6gQwwjyxoKAkqTN2FufdwevblWKzK6uPvqyVpHQaGvYzVLjvc0/o E+XUUUPU6kJ30Zk8qXY2fY6ettGI9F82UF7pZgnYXZ0=;
X-AuditID: 0aa00769-9c9ff70000001856-dd-5eb22c235c13
Received: from scanrelay5.cht.com.tw ( [10.160.7.110]) by scan15.cht.com.tw (CHT Outgoing ESMTP Mail Server) with SMTP id 25.85.06230.32C22BE5; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:16:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from email.cht.com.tw (unknown [10.174.192.6]) by scanrelay5.cht.com.tw (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 79CFC30000090 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:16:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from EXMSN5.app.corp.cht.com.tw (10.174.192.5) by EXMSN6.app.corp.cht.com.tw (10.174.192.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1779.2; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:16:50 +0800
Received: from EXMSN5.app.corp.cht.com.tw ([fe80::f101:bf2c:15c:c595]) by EXMSN5.app.corp.cht.com.tw ([fe80::f101:bf2c:15c:c595%2]) with mapi id 15.01.1779.002; Wed, 6 May 2020 11:16:50 +0800
From: 朱彥如 <yjchui@cht.com.tw>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-04
Thread-Index: AdYjU+6Oihvot3y6QSiWssKNZofgvw==
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 03:16:49 +0000
Message-ID: <11ec16a31cae4c1ba9df4277bebb96af@cht.com.tw>
Accept-Language: zh-HK, zh-TW, en-US
Content-Language: zh-TW
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.144.169.153]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-12.5.0.2039-8.5.1020-25338.007
x-tm-as-result: No-22.521400-8.000000-10
x-tmase-matchedrid: ls1+C1BQP6RHW+94FA8JF8K1Ib9JAALxrogFtKd/P7cLBZEuqIL9SpO9 mQGx4jC3Sa7i4WMGYwF/2SsgU8jyNW7vEKjEI8LygNylVbI/EAyoCf7IdvPAJzAx/HIgP92dgV0 45u17QdcSK6JzGSKc0tAAI+C3I6/Fk6m3AN0zFCCIUoAEwa39/PxeH3fk9hIOl32P5ZifvYaNBv RmKMdxcJfkHFNE2DEXBRrAWwx0NQW1Z4m77UDTHdMrcx6d6fiWR4XBe9rB9l2BQycBk7c7j8+36 IiLxQVLhYYl/W8D8sBpvI0kxLpc0di3Oq+8MQKnyZHnIMmQ+Dh02ZC6RJyIuAL+e4+Xk/QW327S K1D82RQ17vKdxiFcPJr2RmvEvo0wbKtBp+mHX1gOsNNBnlgRWn0tCKdnhB58ZnHerMQW1W/3PDi XO/tFSUvIf+DneKFOh5nNc9GK036HH/OTTjHeKilHmWv4G/EhbR2N6BoQe5I=
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
x-tmase-result: 10--22.521400-8.000000
x-tmase-version: SMEX-12.5.0.2039-8.5.1020-25338.007
x-tm-snts-smtp: 0BA7220623B8D25946D0BF365A6DA10C955450F8CA3E2A7BA0161F19313C7B4D2000:8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_11ec16a31cae4c1ba9df4277bebb96afchtcomtw_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCtYA9T1dZZ1OcQedMJYvTx/YyOzB6LFny kymAMaqB0SYxLy+/JLEkVSEltTjZVik5o0Q3JbM4OScxMze1SDc1L11JITPFVslESaEgJzE5 NTc1r8RWKbGgIDUvRcmOSwED2ACVZeYppOYl56dk5qXbKnkG++taWJha6hoq2QXkpCYWpyok pSokppRlFqemKCRskMm4dEe1YLNKxbopUxkbGD8qdDFycEgImEhMvBHbxcjFISSwnVGiYe4R dgjnGKNE99dtUM4XRolZy38xQjiHGSXuf25n7mLk5GAT0JX4sH0RO4gtIqAqcfrpZbA4s4C2 xKJ1d1lAbGEBJ4kTS/4wQ9S4Sxz8cR7K1pNovriVDcRmEVCR2LB2MVicV8BSYvuFbrCZjEDx ZWdXs0DMFJc4d7EVLC4hICCxZA/EHAkBUYmXj/+xQthKEtfe/oWqsZB4vfwjVFxDov/pBbAH JAQmsUicXjWLCSKhIHFu6xk2CFteYv/LKcyQcFGT2HwxGCJsInFyzwmoOWES7/8dY4S4J0Hi 5KSNLBA3C0qcnPmEZQKjzCwkp85CUjYLSRlEXEPiW+dCJghbUWJK90OoenWJ3U8aoGxtiWUL XzMvYGRfxShYnJyYZ2iqB0w5esn5uXol5ZsYIckucwfjwfmOhxiZOBgPMUpwMCuJ8PL82Bgn xJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iNEUGM4TmaVEk/OByTavJN7Q2NLYwtDIwMzY3MJCSZxXZPqqOCGB dGAizU5NLUgtgulj4uCUamA8q/Cf42/YE4bnKsx3Crxm3+3g/6nns/v1ffn3Vy+FxB3NeT/x 3aGzGifzlk2+l335q3CbwylN8+P+59f2/EhdKxm371Vg3u6l3S+uvfm3I/1AetXUFbv37JEU WT6h2PxMxHxHq3reoHiBeKbO1eGFXwIqKifvDUj42SWnqezefOPB437FBLNCJZbijERDLeai 4kQAOgZUN34DAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sRg-y_MqpnsctOTrg5X8c3z0IGQ>
Subject: [v6ops] Questions about draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 03:16:56 -0000

Hi:
There are some comments about current ipv4ass implementation in Section 4.4.2. (Support in Cellular and Broadband Networks) in this document as the following:

In broadband networks, there are some deployments of 464XLAT, MAP-E and MAP-T. lw4o6 and DS-Lite have more deployments, with DS-Lite  being the most common, but lw4o6 taking over in the last years.

------
I have done some research about the current implementation of these mechanisms, but can not find any broadband network with 464XLAT service.
Does anyone know any broadband service provider (fixed not mobile service) with 464XLAT? I am very curious about this.

Thanks
Yann-Ju Chu
ChungHwa Telecom. Co.

Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.  Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email