Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AAB1A1B3B; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ah4RS5sb71kd; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73251A1A71; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 06:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1038; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413464591; x=1414674191; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=pQaPuBfw6UB84xzbSeq8E7XP/WpVKeHVctphtZyvev4=; b=OSR6DLXgpFn0/fBzcJhabSpsXcNa3hbX4vcZx3C0HYPwXzs58jSxb82X otozRmK7uGynVoDPyuC6e95LR5WUTZxCcd/T1Igd3gYGs+LLv3P2W9F0x snHsVcIOY7pigGLbHiZdIRmwutn5oJOw9HAOPVIE85zHVR4WdBiqF5nUR k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAFnBP1StJA2D/2dsb2JhbABbgw5TXMwch00CgRUWAX2EAwEBBHkQAgEIRiERJQIEAQ0FiCoDEQ3DZQ2GPQEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBHI4ZggEzB4RLAQSPY4IchEaFAYIRgWyNWoZWg3dsgQYFPYECAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,732,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="363798526"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2014 13:03:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9GD3AAT016522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:03:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.127]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:03:10 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Thread-Topic: [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
Thread-Index: AQHP6HO0Yw6tGmdMOUO+hU2KqJts6JwyCuqAgAC3/IA=
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:03:08 +0000
Message-ID: <D06538D0.6E1A8%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <CAL9jLaZLWG5cKPPhTtLtvn9OQOYwYjdgHCUXsWi3pZJjK+nAbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZLWG5cKPPhTtLtvn9OQOYwYjdgHCUXsWi3pZJjK+nAbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <FC09529F084E064E81F0380897289D4E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sWcndehyx8olYF5w3-1j2ErA-4o
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 12:16:35 -0700
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:03:12 -0000

On 10/15/14, 6:04 PM, "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>
>>- A set of communities that indicate whether a prefix is a more specific
>>that is covered by an aggregate and/or is safe to filter without loss of
>>connectivity.
>>
>
>so, add communities to global routes, because people don't strip these
>in ingress as a matter of best practice? (if you don't you REALLY
>should consider it, i think)

Right..  Even if we could make the communities not be stripped (not
proposing that), the originator would still not know the policy between
any two ASNs ‹ not even the receive policy of its direct neighbor!   So
the originator still couldn¹t guarantee that the route is in fact covered.

The only way to determine coverage and no connectivity loss is on the
receive side.  There you can look at the incoming routes and determine how
the routes overlap and mark them appropriately according to local policy.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-white-grow-overlapping-routes

Alvaro.