Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 12 January 2013 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D869321F8790 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1oP-Ju3PUqp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com (mail-we0-f174.google.com [74.125.82.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B18721F8765 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x10so1352715wey.19 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9e/XTqcZr7Gc4fnio7417YSG2iyXsh2JdeTkvPS2HlI=; b=XYFlnC0l1YH86lRxpAxKuP++EHknzGrD5DJemYD1J8fkgo2IMLsKDUcUBRHe1TjWRQ fnUsDhe6O9WovoANwf1LTRm8omKQGqNQY0HqgFhnS6kmO2ji+jv+CfFYXLiacl8hHAmB 3PqejnqUqyG4BCF0reACoTUl7ZKy+4kn6dWQ0sbI+T8eH4Nlv3Qk2HzMNKK8+jlzYsmz sfyK3L4RiV6dBcC6Y6I9aU8ALoNMBaGir2UnMvw7MclVUUEYoHiMaU3O2Mk8UYxamBLd +GQ03N92oDX/0S7mRb8WMJwaaT7W9Jt6c+xjkUp/1/9qjLEl1OXibJJ6CA53YcBrY83J ymTA==
X-Received: by 10.194.9.197 with SMTP id c5mr127154688wjb.20.1358009165643; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-101-188-89.as13285.net. [2.101.188.89]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w5sm4367753wif.11.2013.01.12.08.46.04 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 08:46:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50F1935C.9070103@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:46:20 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
References: <20130111103213.31931.90112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <50EFEB44.1000209@gmail.com> <50F180F7.5090602@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F180F7.5090602@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-05.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:46:08 -0000

On 12/01/2013 15:27, joel jaeggli wrote:
> No major complaints...
> 
> I would note that the section:
> 
>    Is
>    extra memory or ternary content-addressable memory (TCAM) space
>    needed to accommodate both IPv4 and IPv6 tables?  To answer these
>    questions, the ICP will need a projected model for the amount of IPv6
>    traffic expected initially, and its likely rate of increase.
> 
> 
> Appears If I'm reading it correctly to conflate fib memory with traffic
> volume, when in fact it's prefix count  that's the issue for fib sizing.

Hmm. The diffs don't necessarily make this very clear to read. "These
questions" is supposed to refer back to the two previous questions
about performance. I'll make a note to fix this by re-ordering the
sentences at AUTH48.

Thanks

    Brian
> 
> On 1/11/13 2:36 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> This version has minor updates following IESG review.
>>
>> Regards
>>     Brian
>>
>> On 11/01/2013 10:32, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>> directories.
>>>   This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of
>>> the IETF.
>>>
>>>     Title           : IPv6 Guidance for Internet Content and
>>> Application Service Providers
>>>     Author(s)       : Brian Carpenter
>>>                            Sheng Jiang
>>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-05.txt
>>>     Pages           : 25
>>>     Date            : 2013-01-11
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>     This document provides guidance and suggestions for Internet Content
>>>     Providers and Application Service Providers who wish to offer their
>>>     service to both IPv6 and IPv4 customers.  Many of the points will
>>>     also apply to hosting providers, or to any enterprise network
>>>     preparing for IPv6 users.
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance
>>>
>>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-05
>>>
>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-icp-guidance-05
>>>
>>>
>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
> 
>