Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087103A0CDF; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=VbZznMUT; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=QxC+s060
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YCrQLSJyi4cT; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDBB93A0DAF; Wed, 27 May 2020 13:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1122; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590611843; x=1591821443; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=IEa87Lt7ObD098sM6/DEO5mzWrXvfwcbVbw5vvckikQ=; b=VbZznMUT3nVEXTSv5BWqHaUUGpupDQSycI16l/uqmZnzoC85pYpIG2Tz g/MKULDUu0/HtJT1a6hUI0qzS7Z3/ndVGALXFR6K6QAordHLFJt1UJIKs BCNP/O3N2/MEi+0wmndbh4xvaFehlnFrtvbhKEXuLhI6v8xgyPXuC3JWh A=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:rebnPx/W6Lb9Ev9uRHGN82YQeigqvan1NQcJ650hzqhDabmn44+7ZRCN6vBkjVuPVoLeuLpIiOvT5qbnX2FIoZOMq2sLf5EEURgZwd4XkAotDI/gawX7IffmYjZ8EJFEU1lorH6+OElRXs35Yg6arni79zVHHBL5OEJ8Lfj0HYiHicOx2qiy9pTfbh8OiiC6ZOZ5LQ69qkPascxFjA==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DeAQCyzs5e/4cNJK1mGwEBAQEBAQEBBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAUCBSoFQUgeBRy8sCoQbg0YDjT6Jeo5IglIDVQsBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYREAheBfwIkOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVcMhXIBAQEBAxIREQwBATcBCwQCAQgRBAEBAwImAgICHxEVCAgBAQQBDQUIGoVQAy4BpFUCgTmIYXaBMoMBAQEFhSwNC4IOCYEOKoJkiWAaggCBEUOCTT6BBIEagjKDEjOCLZFnoQJKCoJUlAOEep4IhQeLS4w9kSwCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWoigVZwFYMkUBgNkECDcopWdAI1AgYBBwEBAwl8iygBgQ8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,442,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="683844176"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 May 2020 20:37:22 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04RKbM2e024571 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37:22 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:37:22 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:37:22 -0500
Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 May 2020 15:37:22 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OJdo4fOBG68nZphx56FTHtXZL883BDigx2DaD3uZIpthfSY6cFDq4gX4Ogxpl1DBmDdBP9bDVi/AlMbsb6xwnThtOY4nsDhzltGLMwXeF0HgZzDeWZW9a/Qe2zto+CvczPuwO+UFBuGlc/B0/WRphg+4dW9MrkhOUNDxiR2K0mpiyVOHaBCuBkYGNZHUCVpJfWNQSP9qYSSXkB71zfLGVeXB3qGmWC7yls1NUx0zcq5Dy/sf5D+rZy7LhIFhj4opuBzXUKeKSZczNmm+gadfw3DUHEKj40VVytarskvEmr3PJJS6SP+WMmqSIP+zGIfdNz4S5yxmfgFbqqKdJfIP6w==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=IEa87Lt7ObD098sM6/DEO5mzWrXvfwcbVbw5vvckikQ=; b=MY2QRzfdYknAp96SD7iyY6WI7p/3p0A1K0nAZR7bYoSvZvishMuNKXSW9lFeHccsHHhHrtPJixPYmh/rR4RaHCPDdEQ83aqPgkTlqlEHIhpuBcxXcOps0YMOecgIPvIPAsoK2HJdwM1q5nePq6RopZhONpKJaFxDoGNgVm84DRDVASGPd/w2EONNj3l3TQoFv//iEdfjZY8az1lUGZskMlkwKfZE/CZtBVWyVOW4dx+QMGaWcCYbhqV4pPtC8s0KP3Ogh2unfzDDIMBLIzc1cU/cf/kek+aliSV8ATiQbyz2E7LC3OI/OtdwX44pjyW7RPSfIocmnfzb4jQUkCZr6Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=IEa87Lt7ObD098sM6/DEO5mzWrXvfwcbVbw5vvckikQ=; b=QxC+s060/S5p5kIDBO3mz9vL6+iGp8xHfF2dLyTcxe+zeoh1H4Ld9CZj9v6bhv97hZ+29vatddSDYP2GoXgSxzigMgXe3B/ANDpHPw6/GQWzv2tKBsB8Cyh/WknS51nJJ9UD8am3mrq1pultm8N22zcQiIC/x+/riCEAbZbhlWI=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:af::18) by BN7PR11MB2578.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:b2::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23; Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37:21 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7d1c:98b:2131:d35]) by BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7d1c:98b:2131:d35%3]) with mapi id 15.20.3045.016; Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37:21 +0000
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org>
CC: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020
Thread-Index: AdYnlBw72h8m3/s6QES4usbyMd1QVwMxDHdAAACFQ4AAApxVAAAAbrqA
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37:20 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR11MB25470A1FEA287A9B2681B4A8CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN7PR11MB25478F66E43089F189F98ED4CFA10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN7PR11MB2547A8FA4A7817325482BEF9CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BN7PR11MB25473A693F595ECDEFB18194CFB10@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <d8e16846-59c5-f7bd-431c-fa984cd23fbc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d8e16846-59c5-f7bd-431c-fa984cd23fbc@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.66]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 13bc9793-cc20-4201-17b4-08d8027dc151
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2578:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB2578C5A1412AAE85B8F8E231CFB10@BN7PR11MB2578.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 04163EF38A
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ijlwl36/8X3P/cwe6iisl+XWFAd0/EySMHYSG1oHmQEmFkYzUvmEwL7fM/KnvKPFvgXMFbIvycJInJrHHxTb6BcXPbs/Pn2myqx5O/Tp0bVTmU0J3qTqkVxgjdai7FQ48YldECWq1Z/tawDPmYQeCNiC3hyg0oie8pusQhepd61tcjUlYdxbvYKwDHtaJUeTGJrIlKljWVR4NRunT7z2QRiSCz1+o2qOgenz0nTYTkDSD0OrLKujXFo3buQoQ7xANFLN3DPSzFH81fJOky1ohiltBGjAicvxeDnoTcZqbU6YlzH1FbT5E4T8TtDlitmMHe6AVe4K2PqaTaq2Ru9mMw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(346002)(136003)(55016002)(86362001)(76116006)(2906002)(6506007)(53546011)(66946007)(66476007)(4326008)(66446008)(64756008)(7696005)(66556008)(83380400001)(33656002)(8676002)(186003)(26005)(110136005)(54906003)(478600001)(9686003)(316002)(71200400001)(8936002)(4744005)(5660300002)(52536014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 13bc9793-cc20-4201-17b4-08d8027dc151
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 May 2020 20:37:20.7781 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Cvl+MX//k/6AGLz2hZe5AWifyhL1qE0EbaSlv5SCI2YRK/fkXmUtq6SrEkWcJOX6
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2578
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/sy6ZO4QwbpGtLJwcVfVuNqWmLzM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 20:37:57 -0000

Cool. And then the usage is consistent across the document and thus not an issue. Thanks.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 4:25 PM
To: Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com>; draft-ietf-dhc-v6only@ietf.org
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org; IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-v6only - Respond by 5/25/2020

On 28-May-20 07:37, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
...
>  1. “Behaviour” is used whereas I think the IETF generally uses American English so “behavior” would be more appropriate?

As far as I know, the RFC Editor aims at consistency within a document, so either all "behaviour" or all "behavior" is OK, and the same for other transatlantic spelling preferences.

     Brian