Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81DF131BE0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQSKnDLP13Ah for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53231131BCC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id k14so80460267pgr.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oh82KcpARUcvxAOtkFKmn64pB9STo/Dzv4MGmXFryX4=; b=haddEBGu+tQzoAn2Gvr5+lAokdJUwnYgXVyJ99rlvsjV88vXCCBQ5sD8VLLMa9EK/p iGhr/UwLc73AwVafZlNzq2JBIRl0VTmmXOIKt5UAAsWq4qFQoXGk19GQCFjPakfYqbYL l/9e8ZtUFIWsC9b4CkjZYV00Dce6eXm+BCx9q62YtpJ6X+L6oCtgr2/J7VpSwilLd81M evgP9OcvW6fF3TPk0omn46MvBCZUmqfLEsh5U3jaFwdgSnkLWxxtgdIfDJFnpQdwizS/ fMFZ0NFk+EPxy0bT+H0QSh5eZkmeeKDHx59Q+8ijIa3Ktdxpxi1qK7IqeAXurleJexiF OGQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oh82KcpARUcvxAOtkFKmn64pB9STo/Dzv4MGmXFryX4=; b=FIppT27/6M5orPT7pF0iJ79I3sHQOFvxRsiZ49SBtNSOsm26clhabtGrPweDgtS6q7 7QJrfTewGup+BT9NSzW1JDTTwywtN87ujfDI67wwJjlYaU6vMtr79mU+KvhSm2wofNpN n63OvcJQwEcLcqpTEVQYMqBndqyyV3tiobjZvzDudWI24fWBQDJ4tEZUES5Ui7qzJT8d zILw9oWIqCAKvJ4rLJ+18x9wSOJTS1m9DJKeAiwdXVSuS0DDgZsdocipDERlEannvlHD PAWwlKM1Snb4WBymxNZGauuzhnDJbkRJ5jb6SyKXYrTuGYGZ/Z3yQo9M3FRtr0vGYJn9 pYUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111nStlDD2Rs899XPLOE8tmkkQacQLABI/dc9ZWShLJSbESAw3T1 nh0sotj0jd9wvS0keL4+vZKezAIgAE0J
X-Received: by 10.99.62.65 with SMTP id l62mr18975887pga.220.1500300527732; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BASrxoroJVHwxFpwwBxCUC62_VZXsUGgfDOj6y+KVWk6tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com> <0FAF1E05-DA4B-47BF-95F7-7EFCD1BED9B0@cable.comcast.com> <42188852-BBEB-4D75-967F-4BED79BBBCAE@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BARahTfH_Uy_t22EthGuFMJ=q-N1zxismNAVkHWWJA-Obw@mail.gmail.com> <CBA23B1B-C5A3-413C-B399-93F537C99015@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BARz_u92NweYkTizT2=q420sBRh11m9bqWO9+aexCi3ANA@mail.gmail.com> <2A639918-C6AC-44B8-8D66-5293EE13A7BD@consulintel.es> <CAFU7BASrxoroJVHwxFpwwBxCUC62_VZXsUGgfDOj6y+KVWk6tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:08:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1n1dVY-WB6Q6jNUf5=a7K57B4GFR4iDXMYc-6UFR9edNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Cc: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c18ff6a031dba055483f09c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/t4KayM87jjLejbdtZd30ZU9HpXE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:08:53 -0000

To be clear, the reason to privilege nat64 is that it gives you effectively
an IPv6-only network, with enough of a shim that most stuff that still
relies on legacy servers still works.   It is not that nat64 is the
transition technology that the market has chosen (I don't actually know
what the market has selected) but rather that it is the transition
technology that allows us to not run _any_ IPv4 on the link.

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 6:44 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> > I’m saying:
> >
> > 1) We should not try experiments in the IETF network, it has been the
> rule for ages.
> > 2) If we decide to change that rule, we should try what is good for the
> market, not what we “wish”
>
> Could you pls elaborate on why proving that IPv6-only/NAT64 network
> works (or if it does not, identifying the issues and getting them
> fixed) is not good for the market? If, as you said, nobody is doing
> Ipv6-only (and we have seen a number of comments stating the
> opposite), wouldn't it be good for them if we prove that v6-only works
> and start working on issues? If, as some people have said, there are
> Ipv6-only network out >
> > Turning off IPv4 in the WAN, but keeping some sort of IPv4 connectivity,
> is feasible. This is what we need to try.
>
> >
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
> > Responder a: <furry13@gmail.com>
> > Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 10:42
> > Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> > CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Alissa
> Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>,
> Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
> > Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF
> Meetings
> >
> >     On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 6:37 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> >     <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> >     > Tell your bank, your university, your library, etc., to try that.
> >     >
> >     > I now that some networks (mainly related to IETF work, vendors,
> etc.), are doing that, but not in a general market.
> >
> >     Are you saying IETF should wait until everyone else has done it and
> >     proved it works and only then we feel safe enough to try it? ;)
> >
> >     > -----Mensaje original-----
> >     > De: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
> >     > Responder a: <furry13@gmail.com>
> >     > Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 10:34
> >     > Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> >     > CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>,
> Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Suresh Krishnan <
> suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Randy Bush
> <randy@psg.com>
> >     > Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for
> IETF Meetings
> >     >
> >     >     On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 6:17 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> >     >     <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> >     >     > In the real world, you will not disable IPv4 in the LANs of
> end-users or enterprise customers (at least not now, may be in 3-5 years
> from now).
> >     >
> >     >     I disagree with this statement. There are networks doing this.
> Right
> >     >     here right now.
> >     >
> >     >     > -----Mensaje original-----
> >     >     > De: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> en nombre de
> "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
> >     >     > Responder a: <John_Brzozowski@comcast.com>
> >     >     > Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 10:14
> >     >     > Para: Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> >     >     > CC: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, IPv6 Ops WG <
> v6ops@ietf.org>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Russ Housley <
> housley@vigilsec.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Suresh Krishnan <
> suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
> >     >     > Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only
> Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Agree with Noah and Ted.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Note the I-D explicitly documents that a fallback, dual
> stack SSID must remain available as Noah mentions below.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     I fail to see how doing this will harm or discriminate.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     We do need to eat our own dogfood, otherwise we are
> hypocrites.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     John
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     +1-484-962-0060
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     From:
> >     >     >     v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Noah <
> noah@neo.co.tz>
> >     >     >     Date: Monday, July 17, 2017 at 09:01
> >     >     >     To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> >     >     >     Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>,
> Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>,
> Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
> >     >     >     Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only
> Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     FWIW and to cater for all, would a fallback dual stack
> SSID work for the status quo while this 2nd v6 SSID is also experimented
> upon which is a great idea considering this is IETF.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Noah
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     On 17 Jul 2017 9:54 a.m., "Ted Lemon" <mellon@fugue.com>
> wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     I don't think this is a social justice issue.   Does the
> IETF think that IPv6 works, or not?   If we think it works, and we have
> been working for what, 20 years, to make it work, and we have designed all
> this great
> >     >     >      transition tech, then why on earth would we not want to
> use it?   This isn't "one draft."   This is roughly half the work of the
> IETF for the past two decades.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:51 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
> jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     So we agree to change the rules so that we use this
> network for every ID that want to experiment with it? Otherwise we
> discriminate among different authors …
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     I think is a really bad precedent.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Regards,
> >     >     >     Jordi
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     -----Mensaje original-----
> >     >     >     De: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
> >     >     >     Responder a: <mellon@fugue.com>
> >     >     >     Fecha: lunes, 17 de julio de 2017, 8:48
> >     >     >     Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
> >     >     >     CC: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <
> jim@daedelus.com>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Suresh
> >     >     >      Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <
> housley@vigilsec.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
> >     >     >     Asunto: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only
> Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
> >     >     >
> >     >     >         I don't actually know what the goal of the IETF
> network is other than to provide connectivity.   Because of the
> vicissitudes of hotel topology, it is often the case that IETF participants
> experience issues with the
> >     >     >      network at least once or twice per IETF despite the
> best efforts (and they are quite exceptional) of the NOC team.   I do not
> really see what the damage is that you are hoping to protect against here.
>  Users who don't read the NOC announcement?   No sympathy.
> >     >     >       Sorry.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     **********************************************
> >     >     >     IPv4 is over
> >     >     >     Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> >     >     >     http://www.consulintel.es
> >     >     >     The IPv6 Company
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     This electronic message contains information which may
> be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the
> use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient
> be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> >     >     >      use of the contents of this information, including
> attached files, is prohibited.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >     >     v6ops mailing list
> >     >     >     v6ops@ietf.org
> >     >     >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >     >     v6ops mailing list
> >     >     >     v6ops@ietf.org
> >     >     >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     _______________________________________________
> >     >     >     v6ops mailing list
> >     >     >     v6ops@ietf.org
> >     >     >     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > **********************************************
> >     >     > IPv4 is over
> >     >     > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> >     >     > http://www.consulintel.es
> >     >     > The IPv6 Company
> >     >     >
> >     >     > This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use
> of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > _______________________________________________
> >     >     > v6ops mailing list
> >     >     > v6ops@ietf.org
> >     >     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     --
> >     >     SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > **********************************************
> >     > IPv4 is over
> >     > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> >     > http://www.consulintel.es
> >     > The IPv6 Company
> >     >
> >     > This electronic message contains information which may be
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use
> of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be
> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > v6ops mailing list
> >     > v6ops@ietf.org
> >     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************************************
> > IPv4 is over
> > Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> > http://www.consulintel.es
> > The IPv6 Company
> >
> > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > v6ops mailing list
> > v6ops@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>
>
> --
> SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>