Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 06 December 2019 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902A120807 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:02:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pfNeYX_GMCRV for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:02:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2C51120850 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 08:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id y14so3531111pfm.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:02:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=cTUKUYvjdAXoF9uQGUhZQx1GzrtgFNt/YSFxSUbCijA=; b=oCl8cAQWthqxcBhDv7Ih3uMkW+piFTY2HcTCiRyL64tNY2ys4o6L5NssI+Enf3AgC2 UpWWWvMCnLB6wErsBn3IrjqtyStjwCq03BB2Y1ZVAIPmwUatLCvx+iHZoRmYd5tAClW3 WpQ3tPb/sVHovHI9tL/3IQI6cwRG+42YVFdSX4AciKCMBUHKvCi5rNWjJdOqeR/DhbVu ytTWAExXjV2f3T4tfpDuEqkpn9qOsXVfzvdDd0QlQ/t7KPJjE5GGs0inLkXJblAJgSmE DjlIfBTotDJeduVmSvowT6jkU0KElRSVLqIJiU416OulRwP1DD9SHlV1YsSndHa6OiiO RJog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=cTUKUYvjdAXoF9uQGUhZQx1GzrtgFNt/YSFxSUbCijA=; b=itbb+Otkw8be39Xi8bgoxpJanJgXbOLUgRqUUIpLH7UVHJofsySVsbEFI4WqNpJy9y zKDt8Zqop8r6MZf/n89KLYYXdrVrT6VYaq0913VXk/O1GjEOFpXytdGvDkASYy1Y1s1S 3/NxV55OpVPVhm1/X69cASilBMvOW0Q52ntxa9mdOKc8K72F87sEcSTt5tzKseZWcoYW OfwYPwC2gE5QwCJu4IgWYc2oAzaCVz/Ae3UTYU3XbnmNizSR7WK4I++IhDB0w9XPWsIB pTvt7JYffl2VIHem5tm0njxyxbMEkl8kwoleGOVG5xe66BA1ehl9Ic9HEfwYzrOK94+m aRAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkjUg6jvdWjEhYYQDjKF4jbmIzPk4+wGyD0bENC9L4WochGmge 65zGH1mHVeYQEhIdKGE/UbMEEw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1i+cVvXDwPNawOom/XBVMuqgbNwlQHepBM5XeistRj4RrvmS+4PxmSOwT3PwbLA5djfxRtQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:de08:: with SMTP id f8mr4221138pgg.107.1575648157362; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from encantada.scv.apple.com ([17.192.138.54]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4sm3867272pjw.28.2019.12.06.08.02.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:02:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <3E4E9BD1-36C4-4096-8B34-F6C39FC781A8@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2A67D34D-A359-4878-993B-41C3239F5A5D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3600\))
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 08:02:35 -0800
In-Reply-To: <5391.1575645940@localhost>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-link-dhc-v6only@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <CAFU7BAR1JLUZps=CAqJfeQtUf-xQ88RYvgYrPCP+QP0Ter7YFg@mail.gmail.com> <E03BBE6C-3BED-4D49-8F79-0A1B313EFD9D@apple.com> <28594.1575483729@localhost> <CAFU7BAQp2-4EwntFj6Nx+be54-fi+gnQmRgT6yS22p=vYugpzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1L_hdRMiGApa7VKuZ0_f5q1NJ-5sHMeg-dtTWa=Tq6bQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BAS9iMBWkdQF_hwK7squvG9A5f38miS=sWLNns=ZxK4GCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau3WswixgY=B9dPwL-hTtxsjm-X-sJ6iXMtpifUAHF12DQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU7BASYFEcUgJZUvxi+m4s_GELUQV-2C=UaJ35pBz+zpG1XzA@mail.gmail.com> <5391.1575645940@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3600)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/tC5EZqdnzEWgPGHFqrKggxvVHro>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [dhcwg] IPv6-Only Preferred DHCPv4 option
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 16:02:41 -0000

On Dec 6, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> The goal is not to assign an address, but ciaddr is a fixed field, so we have
> to put something in, and I think that we are worried that 0.0.0.0 is going to
> confuse DHCP relay nodes that snoop.

ciaddr is 0.0.0.0 in a DHCPOFFER, right?