Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 06 January 2021 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C738B3A0FC4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:26:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6kYx4zcKcXH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4B93A0FC2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 08:26:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1609950415; x=1641486415; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ca8JMmgl+idm3kxJhO5x4N/rOegglqWBI+42lAtFmgE=; b=R1FBdNqpfvqDLKVYiPr0IUyRLEAuMf1iKliCzMdD5Ufc+WifOJGshYDx mV/dedyc3N4oKxLXYlTBXIvUvp31s8Dv+5QhCMEGk4wkwbYT1kFIrS/D5 hknTbcvLWjN5xKjaBvZZi77P1ouuFrvpOXfe3NemPsPPc+oSbDdMKAnKP l5KlRZa1Et4Z0N6LL+oq3VeMnrpc2VIPbFU4vhM4JpqdZoAMFevFbSQZK 3nvYGST+FRBQN/wAwSCWzibFXXopYKLhbxysqxuklnAMM9jbAW9y/5CX9 SMJg0ylXqUjDTSaTRS8hXGprZ9wnjNmp/SfbvI2k9E2/7niBlYP+QXyut Q==;
IronPort-SDR: TcVPQjj4Y5KNQjpzi5elUlkfZBNgH/BxtGuFCB/OuKxqwvuh9btDrT71bFWpmHtuCdP5jw81Qi 2X2/R5+i3KAusYJ4JXSZc2CGDN8AerYJbQz50kEKOZF5mrD0gnnz9m1g6i7NjCT8fuSEEGQVcV QWJRI3wGwx/zSXe82O6zEeJlpbMyn/7JdGMWQDnPXgn/BorLDm4YxyG/LHpHJPAuBpeVXeGamK crYkQ5c5lXM2VXsrLpGCfH0NReibzDnjgqf7o1tK+TzqxJjEF2imYREdUlfXqRSp2ZQgBEYOSq 5Z8=
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jan 2021 17:26:52 +0100
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E9043ACF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:52 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8611943AC3; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:52 +0100 (CET)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 80A80E7EF; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:26:52 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-7@u-1.phicoh.com>, ipv6@ietf.org, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210106162652.GX13005@Space.Net>
References: <160989494094.6024.7402128068704112703@ietfa.amsl.com> <6fe3a45e-de65-9f88-808d-ea7e2abdcd16@si6networks.com> <m1kx98E-0000EhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <b53b5d62-0334-f791-f56a-f2122767ecdb@si6networks.com> <m1kxAVC-0000KhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <c236e635-518b-fb51-5024-901ec4677c5d@si6networks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c236e635-518b-fb51-5024-901ec4677c5d@si6networks.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/tWf-mYKppbiWI-jKVdNLxr6mRHM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Scope of Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses (Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-gont-6man-ipv6-ula-scope-00.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 16:26:58 -0000

HI,

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:42:13PM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
> And, as noted, there are concrete implications:
> RFC4007 says ULAs are non-global, RFC4193 says that ULAs are global, and 
> a Python library says ULAs are non-global. I don't think we want that.

On a tangent, I wonder why this is relevant at all.

Why should applications, or anything that is not an admin, care if an
address is a ULA or a GUA?

(I can see the bit about "tools that enter GUAs in the global DNS",
but this is very special anyway - because "DNS" might not be "global",
so general "refuse to put ULA into DNS" is not correct behaviour either)


Consistent terminology is important, true, and if we just want to make
sure that something can properly flag a ULA different than a GUA, we
could just introduce

  "mid-range scoped"

or rename the scopes to be 0 (link-local), 5 (mid-range), 10 (global)...

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279