Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 05 August 2013 22:15 UTC
Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF3721F9C20 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TX0VXO51lDJS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0331321F9AA8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wd6so6692054obb.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ioygnE9ehdYhDdqj9t7HVPc/+kcYlFrm5z2RlB1lwmA=; b=Glg32gDs/XbmJUkTr3DWj7RGHazWqTyKPWijjz8yN1Zo5UymqLmYdXolE7nIY1CZYY EHndlRluoczpfVVqh/vGJtf6C9vTyEtAIyAOXtT5nv/KT43P+0f3vOKBSz38qGnCnsv7 4+vPO+9lrrBLzQMvrOXXhZm6r0ywjesXqFpPYIJG4dTZLtyma7s5FkWXsS6Xxo4JzGA0 6U9uUNiwk/0NanFdu2PwSxsprANtFnlC5BHUHhT4M5GLAQoTC0xz1lknl4tx6wXOtfxt ZQv+E3YIHQC2EXkklphw3ByjWGPBVkPKsOrSXw5+ZzqOQKz6PiZM1IlcKvcm/GoBPC1r Wb+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=ioygnE9ehdYhDdqj9t7HVPc/+kcYlFrm5z2RlB1lwmA=; b=is/Rpm3MoaIZ3YGy4hcvaSbdfwSUBlQnOS9MLUp5K4dNnA23uoa+A9KIHge4qVUhZn htx4DzyyjX+Sy92XtBWntJ4dzWtZFFpym1M8NFuYFzRUc24mpyDSJa2ppUYY+lrpq3ZU IZkdYMx1QVHQEqy0LQdFfSgrDq4SeaYy3OxoBXB+mMCdJp/ASPC5lMdfGpcr6vq8JESY fObnZvssozzBj6hFHX02oTFAXaTRSFsMUf2EXCII3f9iUbx14Yb0PyEr4TNNGJ9pzaBL 08bbGLOVtF9Pt7nk7fRMRVONavLclR8NHWHBar/ObsCMTQaode7eydO+Rt0WEcZ5+02S emQg==
X-Received: by 10.43.60.139 with SMTP id ws11mr1783041icb.12.1375740925275; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:15:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.228.144 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B96E2C5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
References: <201308041800.r74I03pC023049@irp-view13.cisco.com> <3374_1375690984_51FF60E8_3374_427_1_983A1D8DA0DA5F4EB747BF34CBEE5CD15C5041E1E5@PUEXCB1C.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B96E2C5@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 07:15:05 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr13GK_cuvkt2LpJ1qJo2NR8eUnY-xfwMF_zWfe0P1mm9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51a8946279f8e04e33aa5d8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuSrCxcSOhS7+ZvV4vxtXHUHsTWtM8Al9LuHyV6+YTDsNNQ7uj+EFnpnBuwGnRMB6xE7fhnlK42lkAsKRB7HcoU12sMLU0muf+0rrJErQQLr1ueykYLFmIJjc8eSVkJrUoHeN0c9DMhzOKHQbgnbdwsxcgnftzKcvlgW9KLOTXUqr0Z0S5NofC3X9wZae943SH0kT+
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6 WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:15:26 -0000
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote: > I scratch my head a bit on the vehemence that seems to come across in > discussions of the ULA. I understand that there is a strong distaste for > NATs, and I share it in the stateful case. NAT creates problems for applications not only in the stateful case, but in the stateless case as well, because with NAT the client must be prepared for a situation where it does not know its own address. This complicates peer-to-peer networking applications such as video chat.
- [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-i… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… christian.jacquenet
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Victor Kuarsingh
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-enter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Martin Millnert
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… joel jaeggli
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Erik Nygren
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… cb.list6
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Tore Anderson
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Tom Perrine
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Arie Vayner (avayner)
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Gert Doering
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Ray Hunter
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Owen DeLong
- [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-i… Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Arie Vayner (avayner)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Owen DeLong
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Arie Vayner (avayner)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Mark Andrews
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Mark ZZZ Smith
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] IPv6-only section [draft-ietf-v6ops-e… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-increment… Tom Perrine