IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-09

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 02 November 2015 10:03 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255B11A19EC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:03:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6wxGFyozv0b for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0BC11A19E9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 02:03:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.4) with ESMTP id tA2A314A019153 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:03:04 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B88DB202529 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A477F20A692 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:09:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([132.166.84.5]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id tA2A2xO3031013 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 11:03:02 +0100
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <563734D2.2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 19:02:58 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010503020807090702010806"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/tfiXosHt0BvRSgGjLWHKemvVE6w>
Subject: [v6ops] Comment on draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices-09
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:03:07 -0000

Hello,

With respect to the design-choices draft, I think it is worth to mention 
in the discussion that backwards compatibility is a 'pro' when 
considering PA/PI/ULA schemes for enterprise networks.  It is not a 
drawback.

This (maintain IPv4 ok while migrating) is the most important 
requirement in the networks I work.

Alex

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email